FTM - Child Abuse and family unit Truths

*WARNING* You MUST read the disclaimer before viewing this website. If you have not read the disclaimer, you MUST click here NOW or Close your browser NOW.

Child abuse and family unit mythology

Hello. This is the all-important Child abuse/family unit mythology essay. This is the most important of all My essays. I Myself am a victim-creation of the child-abuse of My malevolent and insane society. The family unit mythology, marriage ritual, and scared parenta love myth are all societal lies and so have absolutely no legitimacy in Truth or in nature.

The title of this section needs a little explanation. Although this essay is about the Forbidden Truth of child abuse, the family unit mythology is so inter-twined and enmeshed with child abuse that it is not possible to expose the Forbidden Truth of child abuse without also exposing the family unit structure. By "family unit structure", I mean the family unit societal institution and related mythology. The toxic ritual of marriage also comes into this matter, which is given its own page.

Let Me be blunt : Child Abuse is rampant in all societies. The Forbidden Truth is that child abuse is increasing, not decreasing, as you citizen-slaves mentally devolve more and more under the pressures and lies of society. All child abuse within the family unit structure is supported and facilitated by society and societal leaders. Society commands all children to respect, love and obey their parents, even though they may not have nuturing respectable parents. Society has the power to stop this cycle any time it chooses, but it unjustly chooses not to. This fact alone is enough to prove that all societies have no morality, honesty or any right to continue to operate and exist in their current lie-based form.

The family unit structure is based on an illegitimate societal "right" of the biological creators of children to automatically be granted the "right" to own those children as property. This system is insane. Even though there is nothing wrong with the biological creators raising their own offspring, there absolutely MUST be no entitlement to do so.

Note that not only does society decree that you can raise your own biological creation, but society forces and foiseters this onto the biological creators of the child, using the ridiculous label of "parents". Briefly for now, this often leads to serious social problems, including the murder and dumping of babies by young mothers not wanting to be morally badgered into having to raise their biological offspring.

There is no legitimate basis for this policy, only a lie-based malevolent dictate. Some will argue that "Its nature to have offspring and raise them" or that "parents naturally love their offspring". These arguments are false. Firstly, if you ever watch animals in the wild, they will often kill their offspring. Sometimes they reject their offspring, even healthy offspring, for various reasons. At any zoo, when animals are giving birth, zoo staff must be on hand after delivery in case the biological mother rejects, or even kills, her offspring. They are ready to whisk the baby animal away to safety.

SO : The family unit structure is lie-based, and is therefore a negative factor on any legitimate human rights and philosophical thinking.

Elephants will often raise their young in a pack-manner, as do lions. They do not live in "houses", have a mother and father who are "married" and have sole control over the first quarter or so of the child's life. Polar bears will often abandon one sibling, or all of them, if she needs food to survive or cant raise that many cubs.

Bears will raise their offspring lovingly, they do not sexually abuse them, they dont routinely assault them, and most importantly, they raise them based on their natural instincts and a fixed and normal behavioural pattern for that species. Since nature and evolution favour good specimens, and animals dont duffer from mental derangements and other societal pressures, they make good primary caretakers within their abilities and natural raising instincts for that particular species. However, even if animals did in fact routinely assault, abuse, lie and destroy their offspring, human society still cannot allow that to happen in society.

Humans are not living in nature, and often not living natural or legitimate lives, and cannot be trusted. The primary caretakers of human offspring must be fit for the job, especially that human babies are much more defenseless and unable to care for themselves compared with most animal babies.

There is no reason why the biological parents should automatically be granted a default right to be able to raise their biological offspring, let alone have this "responsibility" foistered upon them by society. It should be a choice for all primary caretaker that have a parental license, and any parent who abuses or is unfit to raise a child should not be able to regardless of their choice/preference.

We must pass a test to drive a car, to be a plumber, a chef, and likewise all primary caretakers of children should be lawfully required to pass an extremely rigorous licensing test to be entitled to become a primary caretaker for a child. This is True whether it is their biological offspring or otherwise.

However, society does not want to protect children from current abuse, let alone implement child abuse prevention measures. As the psychohstorian Llyod DeMause (www.psychohistory.com - "the history of child abuse" essay) revealed, society is run on sacrificing each new generation of children to their enraged/frustrated parents to regulate emotional homeostatis in society's adult citizen-slave population. Like old Roman times, an "offering" is made to keep loyalty, reliance on poison-containers and stability in the adult citizen-slaves.

Society says : "obey and respect your parents", it says "You belong to these particular parents and you cannot choose to leave them", it says "You can't sue your parents". The fact is that child abuse is not being "battled" by society, as societal leaders will claim. Society faucilitates, sponsors, and promotes all forms of child abuse committed within its family unit structure, while also denying and dismissing claims to the contrary. Society also sponsors "bullying" child-child abuse via the education structure, which I explain in the bullying essay.

The reason why society has the gall falsely claims that is is "trying" to stamp-out child abuse when it is doing nothing of the sort is to keep it's illusion of decency. Societal leaders have built society on a web of lies. They have used moral co-ertion as their primary weapon of conformity and control.

The fact is the police do not force everyone to obey all the time. They could not possibly do so. The citizen-slaves are conditioned to obey. I repeat : Societal leaders have used moral co-ertion as their primary weapon of conformity and control. And they fear losing that control and being realized as the cause of all societal ills.

They have falsely morally demonised and branded certain views and actions "bad" and "immoral" and "wrong". They cannot therefore admit to being behind these actions or even be sponsoring them. Therefore, societal leaders choose to always minimize child abuse, and pretend that they are "trying to solve the problem". Societal leaders claim that its just too hard to stop, that they cannot save children from abuse by "violating" the illegitimate "rights" of parents to raise "their" offspring and their privacy rights etc. However, they can currently stop it now,

Society is run on child abuse, and the primary psychological mechanism that functions in all cases of abuse is that of the Poison Container, as revealed earlier.

And of course, society will lie and claim that it is "powerless" to stop child-abuse due to "a lack of evidence" in any specific case. So basically society claims that it is not encouraging, sponsoring and facilitating child-abuse, but it somehow cannot acquire the evidence. funding etc. needed to help the child. Society claims that the "rights" of the adult human being are so important that the rights of helpless and innocent children must be forfeit to protect the frivolous rights of the parents. This is malevolent and lie-based .... this is absolutely untrue!

Funding is the easiest lie to uncover. Australian society has literally billions of dollars for waste-of-money projects such as the Myki ticketing systems, giant wheels and so on as discussed earlier. What is more important? Building useless ticketing systems to replace a perfectly good one, or stopping innocent children from crying themselves to sleep because of traumatic and systematic abuse?

Another lie is that adult rights are so important that children's rights have to take second place. Obviously the most vulnerable members of a society need the most protection, yet society turns this Truth on it's head. If adults should commit a "crime", however, then their claim to human rights usually does not practically exist. Drug raids, surveillance violent beating of suspects, mass-capsicum-spraying of patrons at sporting events......society legitimizes these outrageous practices on "crime", but not when the children are in danger.

All society has to do is remove the current family unit structure and institutions that create the child-abuse opportunities, and give children the right over an adult. They can implement child protection stations, child-protection emergency report numbers, and so on.

The Truth is that no proof should be required from any child asking for protection from an abusive primary caretaker. If society was based on a sane child-first, protect the children policy, then the child would only have to claim he or she was being abused and not only would there be investigations made into the allegations, but the child would be removed and placed into a safe and caring environment effective immediately.

Children would not lie if they truly wanted to live with their care-takers, had bonded with those care-takers and wanted to live with those care-takers. Even if there might be some rare cases of children who decide to "trade-up" care-takers, by making false claims of child abuse (and I remind you that this is not something I see happening on any significant scale once a Truth-based society was implemented), then we are surely left with a situation that is the easily the lesser of the two problems. It is better to have this happen on a few rare occasions, than to subject so many millions of children to be abused every generation.

That brings the next point : why is there such a lack of evidence in child-abuse cases anyway? The answer is due to the deliberate design structure of the family unit household, and they way that society refuses to investigate and take any practical steps it knows will result in the obtaining of evidence in child abuse cases. Its like saying "We dont have the evidence we need to go and get the evidence."

The Truth is that the various "privacy" and other rights of the accused child-abuser are upheld by society, even though those exact same rights are not upheld by society when the allegation is one that society is interested in stopping. If a house-hold is suspected of being used to hide dead bodies, or is being used as a non-taxable drug-growing enterprise, or a non-taxable brothel etc then the authorities have no problem on spying on, placing listening and video devices in places and hiring undercover agents to spy on the individual etc. They have no problem literally grilling the children that may live in the home, as a means of getting what they need to prosecute the parents in these cases. But note that these tactics are not used in child abuse investigations.

My final point on this subject is that there are many, many cases where there IS an abundance of evidence that a child was abused, and nothing of any significant is done about it. In fact, any suggestion that something should be done is met with ridicule and condemnation by societal authorities.

One example is the ultra-deranged brainwashing program "Wife Swap". This programme is not "cutting edge" in any way, it is a blatant advertisement for the family unit structure and illegitimate forms of authority of parents over children. This programme often films and broadcasts acts of child abuse, and even though these acts are usually not of a extreme nature, they are assaults on innocent children. This programme says "Look, we just abused a child we own, and there is nothing but support from the authorities. See, you are allowed, and indeed encouraged, to take out your problems on defenseless children. You are expected to "boss" the children around. We did it on international TV."

An example of "Wife Swap" : A mentally ill, ultra-deranged and cathartically enraged woman appeared on the programme, and forced a little girl to eat two 'off' bananas. Why? So she could harm the child, bully the child, to subject the child to distress while she watched and gloated behind her facial acting mask. Not only did it force her to eat horrible foods, the woman put a guilt-trip on the little girl over starving overseas nations, even though the little girl was in no way responsible for that, and eating the banana in no way helped those starving people. Clearly, the little girl was distressed by the forced eating of the foul items, and was actually making her sick. Was she consoled? NO! Was she told that "we are wrong for letting that crazy woman abuse you"? NO!

There we have a case where child abuse has taken place, and nothing has been done. Is there a lack of evidence? The answer is no. And yet, if you forced an adult to eat rotten bannanas against his will on the way to work, you would be charged with assault, and possibly other offences!

Children are considered abuse-slaves, or child-slaves, of their societally-decreed "parent" slave-owners by society. Other relatives get a minor right to access and abuse. They are decreed by society to be sub-human, and to be used as poison containers. The younger, purer and less brainwashed a child is, the less it is worth in the view of society.

Just a quick note : Even though I use the term child-slave on this website, I in no way condone society's use of children as such. However, to use a term such as "beloved children" or "children" would not do justice to these child-victims and the Truth. There will be no sugar-coating at this website.

Society will never admit to the allocation of children to their biological creators as abuse slaves. It will always ridicule and label the disseminator of such Truth as "paranoid" and "insane" etc. Society will try to have a Truth-revealer like myself locked away in a mental hospital. This is because society is based on lies, and therefore society cannot allow itself to be subject to a Truth-based rational examination.

Societal doctrine says that : A child is simply a piece of property, owned by its parent slave-owners, to be used and abused and molded into their own twisted image. Children are their parents poison containers. Society has devised the family unit structure and the "privacy" living arrangements in such a way as to create a deliberate and malicious prison for children to be abused in by their slave-owners. This is the horrible Truth, but we must learn to accept it because it is the Truth.

It is True that some slave-owners do not abuse their child-slaves relative to the extents that other parents do. Some child-slave-owners raise their child-slaves quite well, but these are in the extreme minority in society. However, these slave-owners still have societal permission to abuse their child-slave at any time they wish to do so.

Notice that anyone is allowed to have a child and then own it automatically. It is easier to obtain permission to own a child-slave than it is to obtain a forklift license in australia, or any other society for that matter. There are no tests, no checks, no supervision and no special police squad to help children. The whole structure of living in a society is designed to facilitate child-abuse, while maintaining the illusion that society is somehow "powerless" to try and stop it. It is also designed to imprison the child.

Each child is sentenced to 16-21 years of enslavement and imprisonment with their slave owner parents, depending on what society/state you are in. The prison of the "household" is very real, and this type of prison can operate without bars because society had devised it so no child can survive without it's slave-owners. Can't work, can't rent a home, can't earn money, can't go and get new caretakers, can't win the lottery and keep the money etc etc. Of course, if the child escapes the prison then we have police and social services to bring the child back. Social services are instructed to bow to the wish of society, and "return" any child that comes for help. Perversely this is called "ethics", whereas the Truth is that this act is totally unethical to say the least. No honest, moral and ethical person (from a Forbidden Truth-based perspective) can hold down a job in the social services for any significant length of time.

So, there is no escape from the family unit prison. Society even claims that the family unit prison is not a prison at all! The excuse here is "the child can go out with permission of his parents". Does that render something that is a prison otherwise? No. Think about it. Criminal and psychiatric prisons have day-leave programmes. They are still prisons.

Despite all this, society does not take responsibility for it's policies of imprisoning children as abuse-slaves. No, society always tries to reverse the blame on the child. This is due to society itself being guilty, and because society is guilty, it chooses to pretend that it is the child that is "wrong"/"guilty" etc. Society pretends it can't understand what is happening. Sometimes society, via it's agents of terrorisation, will even demand that the child apologize. This is cowardly and sick stuff, and at of child abuse in itself. Why should the child apologize for trying to escape unjust abuse? They know deep down that society is as fault, that the child has done no wrong.

However, due to it's commitment to lies, society even fascistly demands that certain words be used to describe these escapes. Instead of the Truth-based and appropriate word which is 'escape', the label society has invented is "run-away" from "home". "Oh, X ran away from home" instead of "X courageously escaped a child-abuse prison run by his parents and society". How can you claim that australians enjoy "freedom" when you facistly decree that invalid, inappropriate and non-descriptive words are supposed to be used by people?

Lets take a look at "ran away from home" label :

Firstly, "runs away". It's not "escaped". This is used by society to make it look like it is all an accident, like the child almost got lost, like the child didn't really mean it. Of course, the child knew what he or she was doing and had every sane and rational judgment in doing so. The Truth-based term here is escaped, as seen earlier. The second label is "home", which again is used to not only soften the image of the prison, but to also infer that somehow the child "belongs" at this place.

Put it together, society's deceptive message is : "the child almost accidentally lost himself from the place where he belongs and is safe and should be." They really mean : "That child is decreed by society to be the property of it's slave-owners. I have a slave myself. That bastard is defying our society and making us look bad. It must be returned to its allocated prison, so appease the slave-owners and stop bringing attention to the problem."

The Truth-based statement would be : "A tortured victim who is just a child and creation of our evil and lie-based society has valiantly and desperately escaped prison to flee unjustified abuse and bad treatment that is being sanctioned by society."

The Truth dictates that : "The child's greatest danger is actually from those he knows, those holding him captive in the prison. The family unit members are probably abusing him/her that's why she/he choose to escape. We must investigate. Did the child get lost? Or did he willingly escape? Why did he escape? We must remove the child from the family unit prison and place him or her in a nurturing and benevolent environment while we investigate. We must explain to the child how it is not his fault, how he or she was right and courageous in their escape and how it is all the fault of society." We must find out why, and take further action if need be - BUT NO!

Society refuses to acknowledge this Truth. Societal leaders want children to suffer, they use the children. Any politician who refused the "right" of adults to own children for abuse would lose virtually all citizen-slave support overnight. This shows us the real nature of these so-called decent australian people. Of course, society will strongly deny all of this, trying to ridicule and even threaten the individual who dares express these Forbidden Truths, even though they are clearly correct to any sane and rational thinker.

What happens if the escapee (or other) child has no food and shelter? Do you provide these for them? No! There are no "under-age" homeless shelters for little children. This is a big clue as to the scope of organized child abuse in society. They are not allowed to hold young children at the homeless shelters, at least for a long time. Society says that they must be "returned" to their parents. The child goes home, because he or she is without food and shelter.

A quick note : When I was a child I ran away from home several times. One time I starved and slept without shelter but such were the terrible conditions at My family unit prison, I refused to go home.

Society will try and hide how sick it is with a claim that there is "child protection" agents and facilities! It will claim that "most" children are happy, to try and make the suffering child feel abnormal as she/he cannot see into the other children's homes. In itself, this is an act of child-abuse in itself and a promotion of child-abuse by society. The Truth is that child abuse powers society like a battery powers a torch.

Does it have to be this way? NO! Its a choice. Society has the power to change, but refuses to do so! Therefore society is choosing to continue the cycle and therefore continue on with not only child abuse, but with crime and suicide etc. Society does not even try and reform. Society doesn't even build a Truth-based, actual functioning anti-family unit child-welfare centre on every block to combat child abuse. It doesn't have a special anti-child-abuse squad to investigate child abuse. Most important of all, society will not reject the family unit structure and the so-called entitlement of biological creators of children to own them by default.

Just look at the number and size of any child-protection agencies in your state. You probably don't even know their location. Am I right?

Look at the fact that children are given telephone numbers for police, fire, poisoning (how common is this???) and yet are not given a number for a so-called child-protection agency. It's easier for a child to find a McDonald's restaurant than a child protection agency. Don't believe Me? - ask a child for directions to both and see which one he knows. The child probably doesn't even know what a child-protection centre is!

And if an agency was found? What then? The various agencies, which are mearly Family Unit Enforcement Centres would simply return the child to the parent slaveowners. It will claim that "It's best for the child" and that no abuse was "proven" by the child, even though an adult with the exact same claim and injuries would be believed or at least seriously investigated if they were in a police station. It will cloud the issue with lies if need be by trying to claim it was an "accident" or "he didn't mean it, he really loves you", despite the child-welfare worker was not even there and could not possibly know if it was not deliberate, if the child was loved etc. It would try and pretend that the child somehow "brought it on himself" via his behaviour, even though this is absurd and would not be grounds if an adult were assaulted. The Truth is the so-called "bad" behaviour is the child's reaction to previous abuse, lies and myths.

It would ask the child for "proof" of the abuse, where the standard of "proof" would be so high as to make it virtually impossible to attain this "proof". It would also take the word of the slaveowner parents, not requiring proof, as to any "information" on the child-slave. This is done so as to bias any inquiry completely in favour of the parent slave-owners. That does not mean that the individual working for the family unit enforcement center' is necessarily doing this of his own accord, he or she is just following orders and procedure.

We hear of cases in the media where children sue or charge their school-teachers with abuse sometimes a decade later, simply by tape-recording a conversation with the alleged abuser. Yet, if one was to try the exact same thing on their parents - OH NO! Society would refuse to do so "You can't sue your parents, you just can't." etc and so on.

It's saying that the parents have a right not to face legal procedure/jeopardy for abusing their "own" child, but someone else who did the exact same thing to a child can be made to face charges if the authorities wish to. This is not to say parents should pay compensation, be punished by society, as they too are tortured victim-creations of society. It is to say that society decrees that parents are slave-owners and have permission to abuse their children in confidence.

In the rare cases where a child is taken away from his family unit slave-owners, we get 2 scenarios.

#1 Society places the child in a different abuse prison, which is deliberately worse (or at least comparable bad) than the old one. This is to bolster the family unit by terrorizing children to put up with current yet abusive circumstances. Society can claim "Oh, we cant take children away from their biological parents, because they are being abused." This covers 99% of cases.

Society makes sure that the child-slave is taken away to a sub-standard home. "Boys homes" are one example.

In most child removal cases, society deliberately ensures that child foster homes are of poor quality or overcrowded and so on. This is to help bolster the outrageous lie that the child "would have been better off with his parents". Absurd! It's like saying "would you rather be hit by a semi or would you rather be hit by an oil-tanker?". Society could easily create child fostering centers, where no stone is left unturned in helping and nurturing children. But society will never do this!

Society even tries to argue that "oh, foster homes can be bad, but we just don't have the faucilities (or funding) to help the children. Well, I say why wasn't the funding allocated or the required faucility built? We have "funding" for giant wheels and all sorts of pointless projects. The answer is society doesn't care about the welfare of children, for all its words its actions speak louder, when analyzed from a Truth-based perspective.

#2 To generate a propaganda case where society can pretend that it is decent and trying to helping children. Such positive cases are highlighted, paraded around in the media and used to suggest that this is how we care for our children as standard policy. The Truth is that it is not standard, it covers around 1% of removal cases.

Society generally takes children away to punish the slave-owners for something by removing the poison-container-child rather than help the child. It also does so to create an illusion of decency to support the other cases of societally sanctioned child abuse.

Despite the Truth that the child in the #2 scenario represents only a tiny fraction, or about 1% of all child-abuse removal cases, you all lap it up because you believe what you are told and want to believe. This lucky child got good treatment as a propaganda exercise.

In fact society is so malevolent, and yet desperate to keep up an illusion of decency, society needs to single out scapegoats for it's citizen-slaves to demonize. Various child-molesters and "kiddie-tocuhers", as well as citizen-slaves that look at pictures of naked children are arrested and broadcasted all over the controlled media channels. You all then judge these victim-creations, you all say how bad they are for abusing children. You claim to be concerned for the welfare of the children, yet you abuse your "own" children. The Truth is that you abuse children. Your society is actively engaged in the mass abuse of children on a scale millions of times greater than your so-called demon.

Note : that is not to suggest that society should support child molesters etc abusing children, either. Society should not sponsor any form of child abuse. It is to reveal a double-standard and motive.

The reason why society selects a few "child-abusers" to publicly prosecute and persecute is to give you, the abuser of your own children, someone to be your evil child-harming demon so that you can pretend that you and your society is decent. Society does not care about the children. It cares about giving the citizen-slave somebody they can claim is the bad bogey man that is harming all the children. For this purpose, society targets mainly those who abuse children outside of the family unit structure. Society created the problem of child-abuse, and it created the child-abuser / citizen-slave's True Reality. Society created child-abuse, and it will not abandon it's child-abuse systems of society. Society is only interested in making a false impression that it is attempting to stop child abuse.

Social leaders have a use for child-abuse. This purpose is to create and outlet for the extreme and suppressed frustration, stress and suppressed rage that virtually all adults have, and to addict them to the family unit and gain loyalty from the citizen-slaves. The reason society does this is because it is terrified that if the adults did not have strict rules that gave them poison-containers in a controlled way, then the adults would eventually vent their rage in other ways, ways that hurt economic production, social control etc. Perhaps citizen-slaves may eventually realise that it was the social leaders who were responsible for their suffering and target the social leaders. Does this mean that the social leaders are trying to protect themselves? NO! They could simply stop the cycle of lies and child abuse, thereby stopping the citizen-slaves from suffering from rage/emotional problems. But they choose to do it the former way, as they are malevolent.

The various institutions, councellors, psych-people etc. that claim to have services to help those like Me, child-abuse victims, but in Truth these people are living weapons-agents of society, beholden to their society, that therefore support the family unit and the society that facilitated the child victimization. They are there to enforce the family unit hierarchy structures, not to try and help children. They child protection workers are requires to uphold the family unit structure. The job of these institutions is to attempt to terrorize children to conform to the doctrines of society, and to the "behaviour" that is expected of children. They expect this behaviour from their tortured victim-creation even though the way they treated the tortured victim-creation falls well short of this standard of behaviour.

KNOW THIS : It's a Forbidden Truth that ALL the behaviours parents and society complain about are coming as a direct result of their own actions, society's institutions and policies!

It is True that a particular social worker might want to help the child, but they can only do things within the framework and structures dictated to them by society. It is rare for a social worker to fork out of their own wallet, and impossible for them to take the child away to a good home - this would be labeled child abduction. Be that as it may, here is the Forbidden Truth : Any child welfare worker/social worker who supports or believes in the family unit on any psychological level cannot help the child even if they wish to. Any such worker would also be encumbered by the very department and society that they work for.

"These children, you tell them what you don't want them to do in the hopes they will go out and do it and then you can play your little game with them......" - Charles Manson.

You even claim to "love" your children and live in a "decent" society that cares for children.................what a total lie! Most adult humans cannot love themselves (narcissism) and demonizes Self-love, where in fact Self-love is a natural and valuable asset.

Now, Lets look at some of the ridiculous word-labels society has invented to help sponsor child abuse :
See Appendix I if you want to examine more societal labels related to child abuse, although such reading is not essential.

"Spanking" is a form of assault, and the word spanking is designed to infer that the target of this assault is a child. It also infers that somehow this action is not an assault, and therefore legal and acceptable, despite the Truth being that it is an outrageous assault, that is far more serious a matter than an adult being assaulted. The label "discipline" is also used, and this label is used instead of the term "abuse". Abuse and discipline are the exact same thing. The actions when spanking for "disciplining" are simply assault duw to suppressed rage and other emotions. If you did the exact same spanking actions to "discipline" an adult, you would be charged with assault. So the legal division and use of these labels depends on who, or more accurately what age of human, is being assaulted and the outcome is that spanking is legal and not a police matter.

One example of societal decrees that assaulting children is acceptable is seen in former english prime minister Tony Blair. Tony as actually an enraged creation of his deranged and lie-based english society. Tony has admitted "smacking" children, which simply means that he assaulted children. Tony thinks "These are my children, because I had sex with a woman and created them, and I see nothing wrong in assaulting my children in order to gain personal release form my anger and other emotional problems."

Tony Blair was just doing exactly what his society told him do to. Tony was even able to admit to assaulting children he was supposed to be caring for and have this evidence of his actions broadcasted all over the world without the threat of any form of legal or social action against him. It is not a matter of evidence. It is a matter that english society, like all societies, is simply not interested in pursuing anyone because they assault their children, just as we saw earlier in the Wife-Swap example.

Society and slave-owners always claim that the abuse and bullying that they subject their children to is "for their own good", and that they are only doing the abuse because of the child's actions. Blaming the child for their acts of assault against the child, in itself, is another act of outrageous child abuse. The reason why the slave-owner is abusing the child-slave is because : they were abused or otherwise harmed/enraged, most likely as children, themselves and they want to use their child-slave as a poison-container.

One proof of this is when the slave-owner does something that is "wrong". Do they then suggest that the child-slave should now subject them to the same abuse or "discipline"? No! They claim that they have "rights", that they are an adult, and therefore should not be punished - because of their age! In making that their attitude, they inherently reveal that they think the child has no rights, just as their society instructed them to think. If a slave-owner dropped a bottle of milk, and I went over (let alone their child) and chastised them, humiliated them, gave them a smack, and ordered them to pickup the scraps and apologize, what would happen? They would cry that this was an abusive assault, despite the fact that they probably have recently dont the same to "their" child! They may well get angry and violent over their treatment. And yet they claim that children are not enraged and made violent by being subjected to this violence! Amazing hypocrisy.

All the child's so-called "bad behavior", even that in the future, is actually caused by either the abuse (physical, sexual, emotional, by being told lies and myths etc) they have foistered upon them, or just natural healthy parts of development. All repeated violent behavior patterns and so-called "acting-out" are always caused by child abuse, or severe trauma. The idea that abuse is good for children is insane. Of course, abuse is never good for a child. It is always harmful and damaging.

I have found an interesting online newspaper article, which to any sane seeker of Truth clearly shows the malice, derangement and general total disregard that society has for children. Be aware that none of the information presented has any Truth-based legitimacy. I will be revealing some Forbidden Truth about the article. You need not read too much of it, the link is there to prove that the quotes I make below are from actual real sources, as they are so perverse and sick that some sane thinkers who may read this website might think I embellished them.

Lets take a look at this link : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1361425/Parents-to-be-told-they-can-carry-on-spanking.html

This newspaper article shows just hor utterly perverse and insane your societies are. Their words in red italics.

"THE Government will this week rule that parents can carry on smacking children so long as they live in England and Wales."

This statement is simply an insane and malevolent public announcement that child-slave owners in england can rest assured that there will be no change in their legal "right" to abuse their own biological creations. It is literally broadcasting the message not only to parents, but to children. Its telling them "you are on your own. Don't rock the boat, dont bother reporting it. Put up with it as is expected of you". This is an utterly perverse and malevolent policy that is aimed at nothing less than the mass genocide of the well-being of all children.

Notice how insane the decree is that children in other geographical locations are somehow might not be able to be abused. Of course, abuse if fully sponsored in those locations as well. It is mentioned to ensure that all english and wales citizen-slaves are reminded that their society allows and sponsors the abuse of their societally allocated child-slaves.

"Ministers will reject calls to follow the example of the Scottish Essembly, which is to pass laws making parents liable for prosecution for slapping or spanking under-threes."

Ha! This reveals many important Truths.
1. That the "calls" by opposition groups regarding child assaults simply aim to make useless legislation against assaulting children under 3 years of age, who are actually babies. That automatically implies that even these groups are advocating assaults on children over the age of 3 by default. See the next quote for more.

2. How perverse society would even consider that a 3 year 1 month old innocent child is to be abused via physical assault, let alone allowing it. And what is even a greater testament to the child-abusing ways of societies is that even this proposal is going to be rejected! Society is saying "2 years old? No problem, you can assault them to soothe/release any pent-up emotions you may have. Those children are your poison containers."

"A spokesman for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children said yesterday: "This is a terrible misjudgment of the public mood."

What is revealed here? The so-called "national society for the prevention of cruelty to children" is nothing more than a malevolent societal organization designed to bring ineffective action against societal decrees that you can abuse "your" children. It primary purpose is simply to create an illusion of decency that society cares, and to create an official system of perpetual "campaigning" for children that ensures that it will be ultimately harmless and ineffective.

Notice that this organization says that the "public mood" is somehow relevant. The Truth is that the publics "mood" is absolutely irrelevant to the question of whether child abuse should be allowed and sponsored by society. Of course it should not be sponsored by society. In actual fact, there has been absolutely no misjudgment of the public's "mood". The public wants society to grant them the official moral permission they crave to abuse their biological offspring and use them as poison containers.

"Ministers believe that there is strong public demand for the right to discipline a naughty child but favor a tightening of the law to outlaw severe forms, including the use of canes and belts."

What this really means is "We know that most citizen-slaves want to, and in fact need to, use children as poison containers. Yes, they demand this from us, and we are happy to meet this demand, after all, we addicted them to child abuse so they can demand it from us". It also broadcasts the fact that canes and belts are currently used, and are an optional child-abuse accessory. It says currently laws are useless against these accessories, so feel free to use them. It suggests that maybe they might "favor" changing current laws to "outlaw" (but still sponsor) the use of torture implements on children in the future. Of course, this is just to announce that current laws are not going to be effective, and are not supposed to be effective. There will be no societal change in the future, when the future comes, they will put off into the future again.

One minister said: "It should be for parents to decide, within reason, without having their lives policed."

Why should it be up to parents to decide if they can assault their children? They cannot decide to assault other children that society decrees are not "theirs". They cannot decide to assault other adults. They have many aspects of their lives policed. It is just sick, perverse and another ad for abusing children. It says "I, an appointed societal leader and spokesperson for society, say you can decide and choose to abuse your biological offspring without police interference."

This is so obviously proof that society is condoning abusing and assaulting children that anyone who rejects this Truth is delusional and insane. I have heard all the lies, all the excuses from society, and I see through them all. One tactic is to use a relatively minor outrageous societally-sponsored child-assault using a guise. This guise is always maintains that some danger is going to befall the child such as "I assaulted the child because he was going across the road into danger". Now, we have the minimum physical assault used, and an illusionary justification given that is an extreme danger level. This contrast effect is just another trick. This scenario does not represent 99%+ of all societally-sponsored child assault scenarios.

The fact is that spanking the child on the bum is propelling the child towards the danger, rather than verbally or physically pulling the child to safety. Any child who is taught properly, who has not has his self-esteem, respect and joy to be alive broken by society would understand instructions not to run out on the road in front of cars. He would be afraid of the severe harm.

The reason why the adult lashes out is that they are frustrated at their failure to get the child to obey, and lashing out because of that emotion and thereby using the child as a poison container. That fact is this is still an assault, and in no way does this assault justify the much more serious assaults that occur against children that society does indeed sponsor.

"Chores" are another label used by society. Child-slave-labour is the Truth-based definition on what is happening here. The child is being unjustly forced into performing labour by threats, demand and terrorization. The reason why the adult does this is primarily because they do not want to do the work themselves. It is not to help the child-slave, and in fact the threatening and hounding is very negative on a child's development. The fact is that no adult expects to be treated that way. Again we see that an illegitimate word in invented, specifically aimed at children, to do nothing but pretend chores are not forced slave labour. This label is provided by society for no other purpose.

That concludes my basic overview of child abuse in society.

I close this introductionary essay with this :

I am a top-level victim-creation of australian society. Due to years and years of unjust victimisation, My True Reality has developed in such a way that I would be seen as a total psychological wreak. Nothing can change that, no good emotional state today could ever undo what was yesterday. I am, always will be, a tortured victim-creation of My society - and that is True no matter what changes are over the horizon.

Since it is culturally acceptable to abuse innocent children (as long as they are "your" children), the law and what society decrees to be a "crime" has no legitimate basis in morality or Truth.

"We are born with a skull wherein a great harvest can be sown.....they cut away the goodness and leave the field barren, to spray their deadly chemicals within and bring forth a poisoned yield." - D. A. Nilsen.

Click here to return.

References and Footnotes :

1. Media articles on child abuse analyzed by a Philosopher of Forbidden Truth :
Articles : 26 28 29 30 14 16 linked to new tab or window.

2. Statistics on child abuse :
Please note that these statistics are societal statistics and are therefore minimized. For example, I have had over 3, 000 acts of child abuse inflicted upon Me and none of these are reflected in these statistics. Also, a child may make one case report who has been abused thousands of times, even if some of the abuse is not as serious as that she or he is reporting. There are children being abused and humiliated on a constant basis in australia.

Minimized statistical data A

Minimized statistical data B

Media Stories article number 31 showing relation to crime vs sponsored family unit abuse using a poison container diagram.

Appendix I - Societal jargon regarding child abuse and family unit mythology

1. Domestic violence : This term is used to pretend that some assaults that would otherwise be labelled illegal or criminal assaults are somehow different even though the actions are exactly the same. It is important to realize that assaults that occur in a dwelling such as a friends home are not considered acts of domestic violence. It is not the location, act, intent, the level of violence. It is simply when violence occurs within the decreed family unit mythology boundaries that it magically becomes domestic violence. This term is arbitrary and does not represent Truth. It is designed simply so that a petty word-game can be played such as "It's not a crime, its a domestic, so we cannot do X" when it suits society. It is malecolently designed to push the societal agenda of sponsoring all child abuse within the family unit mythology.

2. "Letting it go" : This is an absolutely vile term. The whole premise here is that children who are molested or abused are supposed to heal themselves and just forget their brutal and traumatizing abuse. This is an individual decision, and society has no legitimate business what-so-ever ordering you to "let it go". The hypocrisy here is staggering - society and these societal whores tell you that you are instructed to "let the abuse go", whereas if you chose to abuse another outside of societal guidelines (which is a sane and healthy thing to do with rage and anxiety and trauma) society refuses to let any "crime" act go, even though the actions are exactly the same.

3. "Incest perpertrator" child molestors : This is a term used for child-molestors who only molest children within their societally decreed family unit. The Truth is that there should be no such term. Why on earth should the target's biological relation be anything to do with a matter that is not biological in nature? It makes no sense! It is an act of molestation, the exact same act as non-"incest perpetrator" molestation acts. Again, the reason society does this is so it can be lenient, dismiss and minimize such cases only because they promote the societal decree of abusing within the family unit. At the same time, society uses this false catagory as a wafer-thin smokescreen to pretend there is some medical or other reason behind it's decision.

Click here to return to the "spanking" label area of the child abuse lecture.