Hello. This page will be about the current outrageous court case I have had foisted upon Me by society. The case came about because of societal and government fear and hate of this website. Far daring to publically criticise society, I am targeted by a covert campaign of harrassment, persecution and injustice by societal authorities and individual citizen-slaves and societal whores acting on behalf of society. The current criminal case is really about this website, and the charges are mearly a smoke-screen.
It may be an idea to also read two other associated pages on this website : Right to a trial and Lawyers first. These pages give background to this one.
Click here to go to the latest developments in the orchestrated events involved in the current criminal case, or continue reading on below for the full story of this legal atrocity.
Seer Travis Truman's Official Media Statement regarding this case : "I am not guilty of being armed with criminal intent. The whole thing is designed to punish Me by proxy over My website (www.Truthmedia.8k.com). The police took My computer away, as part of their fishing expedition, even though there was no reason to believe that the computer was of significance. Nothing from the computer was relevant to the charges. Police made multiple references to My website within hours of My arrest. The charges have been trumped-up, and the case is being pursued with predjudice. Some of the charges, such as possession of explosives, are absolutely ridiculous. The whole search of My vehicle was illegal and without legal reason. The main charge is a "minority report" type charge, based on nothing but crystal-ball style speculation about what I might to in the future. I am not guilty. I honestly did nothing wrong, nor was I out for criminal activity of any variety on that night. The police lied under oath, and they make mistakes - but if they do the transcripts from these hearings are not made available. The police forensics man is corrupt and refuses to do standard forensic tests - yet he still wants to present what he claims his findings would be if he was to do the tests. I will most certainly not get any legal fairness. I cannot get a fair trial. My own defense lawyers are deliberately and unethically enacting a plan to abandon and sabotage My case."
What is the nature of the charges?
The charges involve being allegedly unlawfully in possession of a knife and firearm (replica), which is actually just a toy plastic "cap-gun" I had left in the boot of My car that I had for self-defence training.
The main charge is one of being "armed with criminal intent" where I was in My car driving with the so-called "firearm" in the boot. No crime was committed in the area, nor is it suggested that I was out that night to commit a crime. Nor is any specific target, complaint, victim, or type of crime (i.e. robbery or rape), date or time able to be specified in the case. It is a matter of "crystal ball" style speculations about what I *might* use the items for in the future. This is actually worse than the film "the minority report" scenario.
Why can't I get a fair trial (besides the fact that the charge is ridiculous)?
I do more than simply criticize society and culture, I completely demolish all the values, lies, myths, dogmas and institutions of society - both at this website and in My mind. You loyal citizen-slaves hate and fear anyone who can do this, who reveals what you are. I reveal the Forbidden Truths of life, humanity and society. This is why I did not get a fair legal hearing in the past, this is why no lawyer will represent Me properly, this is why I will get no legal fairness at this trial. It has absolutely nothing to do with any crimes I may have or may not have committed. You only have to research the reaction I get on some of the debate forums, or to look up the persecution files page to see how feared and hated I am.
I have no doubt that any jury who is so much told about the Forbidden Truths, this website, or even the phrase "Seer Travis Truman" will become absolutely so overcome with perverse and irrational hatred for Me that they will surely find Me guilty, regardless if the case against Me is proven. All it takes is one quick word, from one single human being....and the whole trial is instantly rigged. Would the authorities do this? - you can bet they will.
See below for the adjournment and "unavailable" lawyers fiasco for more reasons why the trial is not fair.
Most critiques do not go all the way like I do, don't explore all the issues in depth and they sugar coat the Truth. Most so-called rebels and protesters are really complaining that society is not implementing it's values and by doing so prove they actually agree with those values. Thus, they do not legitimately criticize society and culture at all.
One female present furing the first search of My living quarters stated before the examination of My computer (during the excecution of the search warrant to get it) "Does he (refering to Me) have a university degree or something?" Which refers to this website and the Forbidden Truth researches. It's about this website all right.
Police detective who is the "informant". We will call him Detective MC.
Has rejected the Forbidden Truth. Has stated (as he returned My laptop computer that was sent to victoria police forensic sciences) "Some of the stuff we found on there.... you have got some far out beliefs". --MC
Uniformed police woman who lies in court. We will call her pig-thug MB.
"I guess we will have to wait and see if the jury believes us." - Pig-thug MB to her parner pig-thug DS shortly after both these pig-thugs were lying through their back teeth under oath.
Uniformed police man who lies in court. We will call him pig-thug DS.
This pig-thug really likes to cut corners, lie under oath, and target and persecute those whom he does not approve. Evidently, he also has very selective memory problems. "I can't remember" - Pig-thug DS's mantra under oath after his web of lies became tangled during the committal phase of the proceedings.
"Forensic scientist" societal whore John-K.
This man is a liar, deceiver and is biased in all his testimony. He made testimony via video-link, because he is a liar and dishonest. He would prefer not to lie to My face and the jury. He claimed that he had conclusive evidence to give regarding certain items being explosives and firearms (which they are not), but when questioned admitted that he never even did any tests on the items to ascertain his rather infalted and ridiculous claims.
The case is already comprimised. Not only is the forensic evidence tainted and biased, but My solicitor has disobeyed My instructions and refused to obtain requested and important transcipts.
The firearm (2) is being touted as a "firearm in the making" with no bullets, no working mechinism and in no way able to fire any projectile even IF one was found. In other words, it is claimed to be a possible "experiment" with future potential to make a fire-arm. Of course, not even this is evidenced. Its just all speculation and throwing of mud, all fear-mongering what I might do and might possess in the future. Minorty Report policing and crystal-ball hysteria is their case.
No fair trial or fair play in new case -
A new form of persecution is being used against Me by society. Each lawyer I hire is being ordered or otherwise persuaded both by pressure from certain legal figures and being shown this website) to un-ethically abandon their client (Me) right beore the trial. Then, with less than 7 days to go, no adjournment is allowed, even though the court accepts that I am not at fault. Many other cases are allowed adjournments due to legal representatives being unavailable for a trial date, and even on the day of the trial itself.
The legal system is having to overtly place itself in a position where it's bias is clear. This highlights the desperate fear that society has about Forbidden Truth being revealed.
This is a victory for Me, the Superior, as it proves beyond all doubt the terror and desperation My deranged adversaries harbour when faced with Forbidden Truth. To all those involved : thank you for again highlighting the total lack of legitimacy and integrity of the justice system and society itself.
UPDATE - Late September 2010.
My barrister Rob (after much harrassment and/or interference from other lawyers) and My solicitor at the time Melissa (for unknown reasons) have both ceased representing Me without any prior warning, nor without any justification being given. Of course, this is unethical and unreasonable. In australia, no legal representative is supposed to abandon their client. My trial begins in four weeks, and I have been very ill. The trial should have just been adjourned.
I don't even know if the new barrister will be suitable, and I have many, many enemies in the legal professions to watch out for. It is also hard to get a lawyer if you are a Seer of Truth. I have to re-instruct the new legal defence team, as you cannot rely on the old ones to pass on the right information. I require a delay in proceedings to get a fair trial. If My legal team cannot manage the court date, then a new date should be allocated. That is mearly one delay, the first delay in this case, and it would be for good reason. Remember, when I was held as a political prisoner on "remand", there was delay after delay after delay for no good reasons.
This case has gone forward quickly, so why not allow Me a legally fair trial and give Me a months adjournment? I will be applying for the adjournment shortly, probably Myself as My legal team have refused to apply for such an adjournemnt. I have done such legal hearings Myself in the past. If there is no adjournment, then I am 100% going to do something about it.
UPDATE - Early October 2010.
Subject : Unfair, unjust and biased result of adjournment application and further comments on lawyers.
Featuring societal whores : Michael, Melanie and "barrister"-style whore John L. Also societal-whore judge Hannan.
A further atrocity has committed against Me on behalf of society by societal whore Hannan. I will now detail precisely what happened.
It is important for there to be some background :
1. My solicitor had recently informed Me that she would not be representing Me without warning or notice of any kind. Principal solicitor Michael and his secretary both claimed that the reason Melissa (solicitor) would be unavailable was because she "went on holiday" and was "travelling around australia". They both told Me this on several occasions. I do not and cannot claim that I have heard this from Melissa herself, only via Michael and his secratary. Michael and his secretary are big liars, because I saw Melissa days later at court. When I confronted Michael with this, he changed his story and claimed that she had left for another law firm. It makes Me wonder if she left due to a reason that Gleeson would not want others to know.
2. Barrister Rob had rung Me and informed Me that another matter was predicted to run longer than expected. This was around 4 weeks from the trial. This in itself is strange, because he could not possibly be in a position to predict if he was available or not. Further, he had just been spoken to about Me by lawyer James D (a little twerp who had been My solicitor before). Rob said he would therefore "get somebody else". I told him I wanted to retain him, that he was still representing Me, and that no lawyer should abandon his client. I instructed Rob that if he really was unable to attend on the required days, that he must apply for adjournment. I told him that an adjournment would solve the problem. He seemed unwilling to do so. However, I still did not fire him nor seek to retain service of another barrister. I then rang Michael to try and get a hearing and sort this out, something he fervently resisted and had to be systematically pushed into doing.
3. Consider that I have been very ill for over a month and thus unable to get things done, and My lawyers office had not arranged a new barrister or even contacted Me about an adjournment.
4. I am left around 10 working days from the trial abandoned by both solicitor and more importantly barrister at the time of applying for adjournment.
5. I never fired nor dismissed barrister Rob O'Neil. He has technically abandoned his client, but is still My barrister and has not sought leave from the court. No other barrister should act, and I engaged no other barrister.
6. The case has gone forward unusually quickly, and there has been no delay for the trial as yet.
7. Previously, I was held on remand and the trial was delayed several times for 4 1/2 months at a time for little to no reason.
I attend the court to wait for the hearing before societal-whore Hannan for the purpose of applying for a adjournment of only 1 month. Before My case a defence lawyer "Jim" V applied for and adjournment in his case for several months because "he wanted to help his youngest through VCE". Hannan granted this adjournment without hesitation nor thought. In other words, Jim thought he would be unavailable as the defence lawyer and thus it was adjourned. Then, Jim asked for more time, and was instantly granted a further adjournment again without hesitation. This is going to starkly contrast My application.
Hannan, even before she heard the application, was against it and claimed there were no grounds for it. She did not even listen or consider it, and immediately ruled there were no grounds for the application, even though there were legal and far clearer and better grounds that Jim's application. She obviously had pre-determined the outcome, and I was told by several people, including barrister Rob that "there is going to be no adjournments in this case, it's going ahead on the set trial date" even months before any talk of this application. There is no legal basis for a case that "will have no adjournments".
Societal whore Hannan and Michael tried suggesting that an adjournment is not granted closer to a trial date - but that is actually more reason to get and adjournment because of the sureity that the defence team will not be ready. In contrast, a longer time before trial means that there is plenty of time to engage another barrister, or take any other actions that would remedy the situation. Of course, that is just an excuse and I have had many cases adjourned on the day.
It is plainly obvious to even the most simple dunce that the reason for these events is to create an excuse for deliberate errors to lose My case, motivated by a bias and contempt for Seer Travis solely because I run a Forbidden Truth website and refuse to accept the endless stream of lies from societies. It is also clear that Hannan's refusal to adjourn the case was also done in the full knowledge that it would result in a legally unfair trial. This in itself is an atrocity and is not listed on the wrongs page.
Final Update - Days later
Due to My campaigning, promotions of this website, phone calls and other issues even those unknown) the ruling of Hannan has finally been reversed and the adjournment granted after several hearings in court.
Barrister Rob is now restored on the defence team. Rob is actually better than most hot-shot lawyers as he deals with his clients properly, and is not quite as entangled in the toxic social network of lawyers. This makes him the least worst choice for a denfence barrister for a Seer of Truth.
The question remains : exactly why was the attitude changed and the decision suddenly reversed? The first hearing with Hannan was adament and unreasonable. The second hearing also was adament that there would be no adjournment. Then, a sudden and un-explained change in the attitude, atmosphere and outcome.
Why? It is not possible to be certain, but the most logical answer is that authorities did not want to give Me an appeal point, and this way they still have one of their own in the mix, rather than the possibility of Me representing Myself. There is also an element that the growing history of unfair and biased court rulings against Me brings continued attention to the case, and thus to Me and this website. This time around they are trying to keep it looking legally clean and legally fair on paper. |
