FTM - Martin Bryant

WARNING You MUST read the disclaimer before viewing this website. If you have not read the disclaimer, you MUST click here NOW or Close your browser NOW.
	Martin Bryant
	This is Martin Bryant, the famous port arthur gunman. Martin is a tortured victim-creation of australian and tasmanian society and a reflection of all of you. Martin was singled out by society and persecuted. For a look at his mother Carleen Bryant, and her new book for 2010 "My Story" and related comments by psychologists see Appendix II.
Brief fore-word on the case : There has been some argument as to whether Martin Bryant actually carried-out the port arthur massacre event. My investigations reveal that Martin is indeed the perpetrator of the port arthur massacre event and the conspiracy theory is false. It also reveals that the corrupt and illegitimate legal system of australia did manipulate and terrorise Martin into pleading "guilty" and denying Martin many legal rights. This is not what this page is about. To read about the legal aspects of Martin Bryants case, and the illegal tactics used against Martin, simply visit Appendix I. I will give absolutely no further comment on the diseased legal processes, as they deserve no comment. They have zero legitimacy. What are the main Forbidden Truth issues of the Martin Bryant case? 1. Tasmanian society, Martin's creator, is easily thousands of times more immoral and evil than it claims Martin to be, and has committed thousands, if not millions, more atrocities and murders than Martin ever has. 2. Martin is a tortured victim-creation of his evil and diseased Tasmanian society. Not only did society sanction abuse and assaults on Martin on a regular basis, but Martin was also conditioned so that he could not love himself. Society destroyed his Self-Love, leaving Martin with an intense need to get the company of others. Society then isolated and shunned him. 3. Martin was brainwashed and conditioned by society into wanting to have something called a "friend". Not an ally, but a idealistic fantasy friend who would "just" be his friend. His need for a "friend" is obviously linked to his social conditioning/brainwashing. Martin would have been fine, despite the abuses and humiliations if he had never lost his natural shield of Self-Love. 4. Martin was left alone, and felt lonely, leaving him rejected. Martin was left by the wayside with the torments that had been reflected onto him. No attempt was made to help, compensate and reconcile with victim Martin. 5. Martin realized the Truth he was a torture victim of his society, that he was being ostrisized and that he was an outcast. He realised that he had been used and abused by society as a public, socially accepted and allocated general poison-container. He knew that no-one cared about his rights, feelings or welfare. He realized that he would always be shunned, as his society ordered him to be shunned because he had a so-called "syndrome"-type disability. 6. The police, and other authorities, would immediately, severly and unjustly punish Martin if he took action to make his childhood tormentors stop the abuse, under the insane guise of justice and human rights. Martin lived under constant threat not to stand up for his welfare, just as blacks under apartied lived under constant oppression. 7. Martin realized the Truth that any human who was a loyal member of his society was at fault, was responsible either directly or indirectly, that the True and correct target of his True Reality rage was his society. Therefore, Martin did not need to seek out specific citizen-slaves to kill in order to avenge his torture and bathe in the warm, sunny glow of psychological and emotional bliss after years of torment.
Self-Love, Martin's need for a friend and the issue of Martin harming himself. Martin was born innocent and pure. He was born with instinctual Self-Love, in fact all babies are born with Self-Love. Just take a look at a child at two. Here, he has already endured 2 years within human society, but is still able to proclaim "I am so great" - and he means it! But what happens to this two-year old Seer? The broken adults, subconciously knowing both they cannot self-love and that thier society instructs them to destroy all the self-love any child may have, set about maliciously destroying the child's self-esteem and ego. They teach the child a lie : "you are not the center of the universe". The Forbidden Truth is that each individual is the center of their entire universe. Society does not allow any of it's future citizen-slaves to love themselves, however, and even demonizes narcissism as being an illness when it is a highly useful and important natural asset to the individual who has it. Like I said, Martin was born with Self-Love. Society then proceeded to launch an unprovoked assault against Martins' natural Self-Love, ego and rational thinking capabilities. This constitutes a front-line provocation and line of attack on Martin. Due to the undeserved and brutal abuse, brainwashing and conditioning Martin received from society, or more accurately the unique effect of that conditioning on Martin, Martin had a very strong need for company and for a friend. However, better cannot be said for most of you loyal citizen-slaves. Sure, real friends (or to use a better term allies) can be of legitimate value. This does not mean that you should require friends to feel contented and loved. There is a natural in-built need for human company in some species, and humans is one of them. However, there is an important difference between desperately needing company every day or so to feel good and the preference/need to have company on occasion. When there is no company to be had, top-level Self-Lovers will be just fine. It will have no effect. Most people who cannot Self-Love, however, need company all the time, some even on a daily or even hourly basis to remain feeling stable, calm, relaxed etc. I repeat : there is an important difference between desperately needing company and the natrual preference of some species to have company on occasion. Those who cannot love themselves cannot give you love. It seems Martin could not love himself. He therefore would have had great difficulty getting the attention his True Reality desired and needed. In fact, Martin used to book flights for the purpose of obtaining a captive audience. But this was not enough. It only could work for a short while. No, what Martin needed was his self-love, but that was destroyed by australian society. The Truth is that society's actions against Self-Love are 100% illegitimate and malevolent. There can be no legitimate purpose for these unprovoked assaults on children. The argument that this is to somehow "protect" or "help" children is completely ridiculous. Firstly, the manner of which is used to destroy this self love is to harm the child. Second, the act of destroying the self-love of a child is perhaps the single most terrible thing that could be done to the child bar killing it outright and perhaps some extreme acts of abuse and torture. Think about what your life would be like, the control you would have, if you could internally give yourself all the love you needed, unconditionally! Loss of Self-Love is one of the things that happened to Martin. Martin was thus suffering from lonliness and depression. I think Martin did not realise that, even intellectually, that he needed Self-Love, and that society had brainwashed him into needing a friend to stay emotionally well. Martin might have spared those people if he could self-love. If only Martin was not subjected to the torments that he was. Then those people would also have been spared. Martin's actions at the port arthur massacre were one of the sanest and healthiest decisions he ever made. Despite an early life seemingly spent rejecting Truth, he correctly directed his torments outward back at society at port arthur. At least for the brief months beforehand Martin was more Self-Loving, thinking clearly about his True Reality and facing the Truth about his victim-hood status than before. The problem is not inherantly one of directing all external societal attacks outwardly and reflecting back onto society at all. It is not the realizations of personal and Forbidden Truths. It is not with realizing the most reflective activity Martin could perform was to exact a Truth-based justice on society. The problem was with the lie-based structures of society that instigated the various assaults and emotional and intellectual damages that set Martin's True Reality in such a manner that the honest and reflective action would be to undertake mass murder actions. I now think it is time to address the ludicrious argument that Martin "should" have killed himself rather than killed others. I almost don't know where to start! This concept is sick, and not at all correct. The Forbidden Truth clearly dictates that Self-Love is Superior and death is the most terrible fate possible. It is also only natural that one looks out for his interests. A hungry animal does not kill itself rather than the prey. But let us suppose Martin did "kill himself". This act is Self-Murder and this act is the murder of a long-tortured victim-creation by society, not simply by Martin. It would be a form of societally-induced murder. Self-murders are at epidemic levels. Self-murders occur because of the abuse and destruction of Self-Love that society foisted upon these victims. Society created the True Reality conditions and broke the Self-Love that caused them to undertake a self-murder act. How can this self-murder of Martin possibly be justified? The Truth is that it can't be justified. Martin would not even be a "murderer" of others in this scenario, as he would have died without undertaking the port arthur massacre, and yet you creatures would want him to die, after years of torment for doing nothing wrong! How can you possibly think that is rational? Do you creatures think? The absurdity boggles My mind! That is an insane, malevolent and deranged suggestion! You want strangers to die via self-murder, yet you also cry foul when somebody is "murdered". What is at the heart of this? Society has instructed all its mindless and brainwashed citizen-slaves to hate themselves, to put others first. Society gives the malevolent and lie-based instruction "if you are going to murder, murder yourself", as part of its murder-conducting efforts. When Martin killed others and did not kill himself, this insane principal of society was violated and it was that which has angered you filthy and homicidal/suicidal humans. Society has no respect for the Truth, or sanity.
	Martin Bryant had a strong societally-induced need for company. He often turned to animals for company. Animals like the one Martin is holding are always sane and Superior in nature as they are not tainted by myths, lies and brainwashings nor are subject to family unit tortures that afflict you vile human creatures. This is WHY they do not perform killing sprees etc. It is NOT because the animal is incapable of killing/doing so. A lion or elephant is certainly capable! Lets take a moment to imagine a murderous elephant in a crowded shopping mall. The carnage! They are most certainly capable. Wild animals simply have not been created and tortured by a society.
It has been reported that Victim Martin has self-harmed and mutilated himself as a result of the unjust punishments and abuse society has foisted upon him. Societal reports can be dishonest, but in this case the nature of the incidents make them fairly reliable. These include slashing his inner thighs and groin area with a razor to severly harm himself, and most likely kill himself. This is a societally induced action. This proves that the punishments Martin is suffering are unjust, and that Martin has sadly not been able to love himself. We should not blame Martin, this does not negatively reflect on Martin at all. It directly negatively reflects on society. Society proves it is utterly immoral, sick, insane, demented and malevolent by it's very treatment of Martin. Martin deserves and needs a Benelovent Resort Detention System environment if he is to be imprisoned. I do elaborate that no Truth-based society could imprison Martin because he undertook murder acts under a lie-based societal system. But if he is to be imprisoned, in any type of society, it should be using a Truth-based detention system, as outlined in the crime essay. Yet society denies even these basic Truths. These deluded individuals, who are beholden to their lie-based society, actually argue that Martin is self-harming because of his mass-murder actions were "wrong". This is suggesting that the very act of obtaining righteous vengeance is inherantly harmful. This is ridiculous! Nothing is further from the Truth. Martins' actions at port arthur were a positive factor on his emotional and psychological state. Have you noticed that not all killers self-harm? Martin WANTED to kill those people, ENJOYED killing those people. If you think it was bad what Martin did, that is a part of your True-Reality, not his. Thats your delusion. What we have here is a pathetic attempt by people acting as agents of society to convince you that is was "universally wrong" to do what Martin did, that it was all Martin's "fault" and that anybody undertaking simular actions will be somehow magically inflicted with harm. Ridiculous and pathetic! Of course, some killers may feel guilty or have a conscious. But this is only because society has inflicted them with this insane and pointless belief, that accomplishes nothing for the individual. So they don't feel guilt because of thier actions, but because society has tricked them into feeling guilt for thier actions. All True-Reality actions are unique and a reflection of the life experiances and mind-set of the individual. The expression of True Reality cannot be wrong. Only societal leaders collectively can be evil and wrong via thier policies, as they know Truth and use it to assault thier citizen-slaves. Based on comments published about Martin he wants to escape the punitive punishments of jail and "live a normal life now". I conclude that Martin is not feeling guilty for what he did, and rightly so. I think Martin does realise that the punishments are unjust. It seems his self-harm is simply aimed at killing himself because he cannot handle the unjust abuse and punishments society now malevolently subjects him to.

The Intellect, disability and official societal decree that Martin was sub-human.

It was reported that Martin was a little simple, with an official IQ of around 66. I am not certain that the 66 IQ is acurate as Martin would probably detest an IQ test, and Martin is under pressure and possibly great stress. I would estimate his IQ at at least 80, possibly 105 or over, based on adjustments for the negative effects of victimisations he suffered, and other points to do with his plan of revenge and other materials describing his behaviours. It could even be 115 or more. Then again, I think 80 is a fairly safe number to work with. The official IQ is quite likely unreliable, inaccurate and biased as it was undertaken by societal whore psychiatrists.

I know the incompetant doctors at Risdon prison even go as far as to label Bryant stupid because "he doesn't show remorse". This is typical of thier utterly insane thinking patterns. These particular societal-whore psychiatrists are so unprofessional and bigoted that their assessment is worthless. We must also remember that the jail environment and Martin's difficulties mean that the tests are tainted no matter how honest and skilled any assessment could be. I strongly believe that Martin does, in fact, recognise some Forbidden Truths and I fully applaud his choice to express his True Reality rage. This does not show lack of intellect, but the exact opposite.

Society is attempting to denounce Martin's actions by trying to imply that Martin is an idiot, thereby implying that his actions are the "work of an idiot". This is then applied to other "crime" actions of this type, suggesting any individual who performs mass-murder reactions is somehow an idiot. HOW PERPOSTEROUS! Firstly, an action that can be performed by anybody with an IQ of 66 IN NO WAY limits another individual who has, say, an IQ of 166 from performing the same action. Therefore there can be no MAXIMUM IQ limit to any action.

If a man of IQ66 opened a bottle of milk, would you conclude that a genius who also opened a bottle of Milk must be and idiot? Of course not! There are killers althrough the IQ range. Therefore, the is no min or max IQ for killing and general mayhem.

Second, killings are actions. An IQ test cannot measure actions. There is absolutely no legitimate Truth-based method of determining intellect based on the violent actions of any individual.

Third, there is no explanation ever given as to WHY the person must be an "idiot" based on his mass murder reactions. This is because the Truth is that killing is not a stupid thing to do. That does not mean that killing should be the goal, or that killing is desireable. I just point out that murders in no way are linked to stupidity. The citizen-slaves who label mass-murderers "idiots" are actually the idiots themselves, because they have come to an irrational and ridiculous conclusion.

The Truth-based conclusion here is : The IQ of an individual DOES NOT matter as to True-Reality Rage and the personal motivations for killing/crime/violence. Actions/thought patterns performed with an IQ of 50 that are Superior in nature are still Superior. Actions/thought patterns that are deranged and inferior are just as inferior even if the IQ of a person is 200.

No, it is the intense suffering Martin endured at the hands of his filthy society that is the primary cause here. Notice that there is no Truth-based attempts to find out why Martin did the massacre. This is because psyche staff, at least subconsciously, already know why and they want to bury this Truth. They don't want Truth because they are guilty of Martin's actions as a society.

Now that the issue of IQ has been briefed, we can now look at the psychological aspects of Martin's case and how Martin was created by australian society.

Martin Bryant was an almost innocent young man, tormented and tortured by society. Martin was born without his consent and he was innocent and helpless, yet society had no mercy on Martin. According to psychologists, and tests done well before the port arthur event, Martin has the development of a young child, despite his physical age. Martin has a 11-year old IQ and a 3-Year old's emotional maturity. That is right - a three year old's maturity.

Martin had an autistic disorder, that made it difficult for him to interact socially, amoung other things. This disorder is diagnosed via symptoms. This is very important, as I believe that Martin's condition is not genetic, but rather enviromental. Even if there is a genetic component, the disorder's symptoms are magnified many fold because of the abuse, harm and injustice foistered upon Martin, as well as society refusing to allocate proper schooling and caretakers for Martin based on his condition. Based on years of My research, I am confident that Martin's disorder is inflicted, not genetic. Be that as it may, even if it is genetic Martin still is not responsible for his autistic disorder.

Society has indeed allocated Martin as sub-human, based upon the fact that he was austistic. I believe that persecution contributed greatly to the frustration, rage and righteous sense of injustice Martin felt towards society. Society declared Martin to be a sub-human sacrificial poison-container. Below we will look at court cases, FBI instructional manuals, various so-called "studies" on law enforcement with those with disabilities, where those with disabilities are deemed sub-human. We can infer that when light sentences are given, that society is sending a message that it is not considered as serious to harm those with disability as opposed to fully-functioning societal citizen-slaves. Later, we will examine how the general facist conformitist structures of society, including that the worth of any individual is in his service to society, all contribute to the societal decree that those with certain disabilities are sub-human. This will include discussion of the "Judge Rottenburg Centre".

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/teacher-avoids-jail-for-blackmailing-gay-lover/2008/03/27/1206207265315.html

http://www.theage.com.au/national/cowardly-arson-attackers-sentenced-to-prison-20090306-8rh6.html

That's what your society does, it demonises and victimises the easy most vulnerable targets and instructs its citizen-slaves that these are the preferred targets of crime. Rather than reflecting your own True Reality accurately, society instead orders that you do so in an artificial way that suits society. Society cannot justify what you all did to Martin before the port arthur event to cause Martin to seek vengeance.

Here, we can visually see how Victim Martin was positioned in human society. A constant victim of physical, psychological and emotional attack. Martin had no rights, he was a sacrificial lamb of society. Jane and John Doe are imaginary example names, and the Police are there also, as they played thier part also. Society in general, of course, includes the above groups of persons but also societal lies, myths and institutions. Martin was bombarded by abuse, lies and myths by his society from birth.
Above : A Societal Poison Container Path Diagram. Purple arrows represent emotional and psychological abuse. Just look at Martin's Social Position, and how he was always being used as a poison container. This abuse, bombardment with lies and myths angered, frustrated, damaged and demented Martin and caused him to choose to undertake the port arthur massacre event.
Martin Bryant : EVIL? Nothing more than a guilt-based deflection of blame by society. Many of you have been told that Martin is "evil" or "bad". Nothing could be further from the Truth. In fact, these terms do not make rational sense, and are a cloak for ignorance. Martin is the victim-creation of his evil society, and society is 100% responsible for the Port Arthur Massacre. This is WHY social leaders instantly blamed Martin before knowing anything about him. They avioded asking "why?" with any sincerity. They are desperate to pin the blame on Martin before the blame may be pinned on thier terrible leadership. Martin Bryant has been forced to endure parental abuse, school bulling, lie-based brainwashings of society, evil attacks on his mind with myths, and a totally disgusting further attack on him by the legal system of his society, all at the hands of the society that created Martin and caused the Port Arthur Massacre and, indeed, all other forms of mass-murder. How outrageous! Martin is a reflection of all of you as a society, so perhaps that is why you think he is evil. Look at his picture, the unmodified variety. Forget all the media lies and society-conditioned-illusions. Just look at Martin. How is he "evil"? How could anybody even be "evil"? What could it possibly mean to be evil? Are there "evil" atoms? "Evil" planets? "Evil" ants? "Evil" elephants? No. Notice that only specific humans are ever labelled "evil" by society. Why is this? Because society only has a need and intrest in labelling certain, specific humans "evil" in order to hide the Forbidden Truth. Planets and ants do not come under the societal control regime, so they are not labelled as such. Law abiding citizen-slaves are generally obeying the various decrees and embracing the lies offered by their society. So they are human, but are not labelled "evil". Some criminals do not get labelled "evil", because their crimes are not revealling significant Forbidden Truth. However, when we have an event so major like the port arthur event, when we have humans being murdered without societal approval, then we have to ask ourselves "why is this happening?". It is this asking of "why" that causes societal leaders panic. They know they are responsible, and that the Truth is in danger of being revealed. So it is in these cases that society chooses to deploy the "evil" label. Societal leaders are desperate to convince you Martin is not only responsible, but "evil", so as the citizen-slaves will not realise that it is thier social leaders who are responsible not only for Port Arthur, but thier very own tortured lives! It is important to note that Martin was labelled "evil" by society. Why did they do this? Because society wants to project an image that Martin was "simply" evil and performed the Port Arthur massacre for no reason. It wants you to think of Martin this way so YOU dont start thinking, so YOU don't start asking why. It is also to dehumanise him, to help create an illusion that it is somehow justifiable to subject Victim Martin to further punishments. However, there is no legitimate need, purpose or moral argument to punish Martin. Social leaders are ALL cathartically enraged and endorse many forms of killing including : the war ritual, then we have abortion, "executing" spies, other government endorsed "justice" killings etc. Society creates all of the lies and myths and deranged structures of thier society that creates killers such as Martin, but perhaps Martin did not realise this himself : "I'd love to help you guys out, but I can't." - Martin Bryant. This was in response to being asked by police after the Port Arthur Massacre why he did it. Note that this question was not intented to find an in-depth answer as to why, but mearly to pretend that an answer was sought. Society refuses to take responsibility for all crimes. The entire notion of a thing or living creature being "evil" is absurd. The Truth that "evil" energies and "satan" do not actually exist. There has never been one shred of evidence that "evil" exists, or even might exist. Society knows this. It relies on hysteria, emotion and haste. It used the modified media picture of Martin simply because the real image of Martin Bryant did not look like what society has deemed "evil" villians to look like and thus did not meet the deranged criteria for the label your society sought to place on him. The real picture would have made it harder to demonize Martin. So they used a modified picture. The picture was made to look like Martin had "evil" in his eyes. The fact is that eyes are PRINTED and consist of PAPER AND INK. How can any sane person claim to detect non-existant properties such as "evil" in a peice of paper, and then claim Martin has the non-existant properties? They can't. Here are some sane explanations : Martin, an Ultra-Victim, always suffered at the hands of other enraged tortured victim-creations with the full approval of his society, and he could not defend himself against this societal onslaught and needed help. Martin was so full of despair, frustration, rage and hate that you put into him that he choose to murder the life-form responsible for his suffering and victimisation. He was a victim-creation as a child as he is now, his father abused and beat him (a likely contributing factor to the brain disorder the "syndrome", as they would call it, that was also out of Ultra-Victim Martin's control). He was teased and bullied and abused whereever he went, and this was all he knew. Society fed him lies that confused his understanding and sense of reality and Truth. This was deemed acceptable! This was all sanctioned by society! These wrongful actions caused poor Martin to be filled with homicidal rage that he did not want or ask for. Martin did not ask to be born, let alone into the living horror he experianced. This rage was forced upon him by society. These wrongful actions caused Martin to fail to see clear Truth, up until a point later in his life I cannot pin-point where he saw at least one Forbidden Truth : He was a severly victimised and unique person who had every business to kill as many people as he saw fit as a reflection of his True-Reality rage. You people CREATED Martin's True-Reality rage! Societal leaders could have avoided this, could have prevented all this, BUT NO! Society refuses to deal with the guilt and responsibility it bears. Society sponsered and faucilitated that many citizen-slaves transfered a great deal of thier anxiety, rage and frustration into Martin. This rage that they felt as victim-creations of society themselves. Additionally, society fed him all manner of lies and myths designed to warp Martin's sense of Truth causing him, no doubt, to suffer from constant anxiety and rage. So much, in fact, he could no longer function. Poor Martin, with a low IQ didn't even know what was going on when he was just a little boy. How could he defend himself? Then again a significant number of you inferiors can't even recognise Forbidden Truth if it is stuffed down your throats via this very website! With his poison container filling right up Martin therefore had a strong need for catharic revenge that was beyond HIS control and doing. He now had every legitimate business to choose his mass-killing actions as a revenge on society to ease or eliminate this terrible suffering. I'll be willing to bet most of you creatures have plenty of people who you use as your poison container. Got any children have you? Sure Martin has killed humans, but not on the scale society does. Remember again how little social power, or control, Ultra-Victim Martin had. It was not his fault. The same torment, rage and frustration that came from society was eventually, perhaps eventably, righteously reflected back to what caused it - society in general. Yes, all that rage and torment and frustration did NOT originate itself in Martin, oh no, but you creatues and your foul, lie-based, evil society. The bubble of poor Ultra-Victim Martins poison container burst, unleashing the anxiety and rages of society back where they originally came and belonged. Society kills more people than Martin ever did (35-40 vs millions). Society kills more animals and does more damage to the environment than poor Ultra-Victim Martin ever has or ever could. Society's leaders kill left, right and center, with death-penalties, hunting, wars, and other labels for cold-blooded calculated killing. Society and its truth-hating citizens supressed homicidal rage knows no satiety. Martins confused, killings in True-Reality Rage and possible Truth-based mental impairment (Genetic mutation, Physical mental illness) cannot compare to societal leaders actions. Yet you still embrace the lies of your society, blind to see any Forbidden Truth. You still think Martin is evil and your blood-hungry leaders are "good". Absolute hypocrisy! Simply pathetic and morally bankrupt behaviour. What should happen is an apology to Martin, after a TRUTH-based explanation and public aquital of Martin. He should be guided into a happy life, and society should blame society instead of Martin and put into place new doctorines so that the evil victimization and brainwashing of people like Martin cannot happen again. By apology I mean I full apology by the whole nations social leaders, where you BEG Martin for forgiveness on your knees and admit your folly in plain full and give Martin millions of dollars.

Now I move onto the issue of society's claims that punishing Martin somehow serves "justice".

The fact that victim Martin killed 35+ people is no Truth-based argument that Martin deserves to be further harmed or punished or that Martin "should" have refrained from his actions in any way. Many of you are probably thinking "how on Earth can he say that?". Easy. I am a philosopher of Forbidden Truths. I examine the facts, then apply the cold headed, Superior logics of Forbidden Truths upon them.

1. Society created Martin, and continues to sponser the cycle of abuse that it knows will cause more murders.

This is a very important point. Society claims that it is trying to stop crime, and also implies that it is trying to stop human rights abuse. The fact is that society is responsible for creating all the criminals and crime acts in the first place.

Society says "We want crime to stop", yet at the same time society sponsers and faucilitates a cycle of abuse and maltreatment of children that guarantees that the next generation will spawn a new series of criminals. Society also does nothing of any legitimate value to mend fences with the current generation of criminals.

Society claims that it can punish Martin in order to prevent crime but society is not intrested in stopping the causes of crime. Society does many things to pretend that it is addressing the causes, but these are fatllay flawed schemes only serve to keep up its illusion of decency. Society simply wants to create the abuse and the criminals, and attempt to brutally oppress and direct those actions in ways it deems acceptable, such as family unit "domestic" abuses.

2. What possible legitimate and Truth-based purpose can there be to inflict further harm onto Martin?

It's so simple : Martin Bryant is the tortured victim-creation of Tasmanian society. They key word here, underlined, is creation, although the whole statement is one of the purest Truth. Martin's True Reality - his thoughts his feelings his beliefs are the sum of his life experinces reflected onto him by society! Martin was born innocent, all he wanted out of life was to enjoy it and live a life of Truth. But Martin was born into human society, born into an evil and lie-based society that functions by destroying and
breaking the minds of its citizen-slaves and robbing them of thier natural self-love and Truth-based thinking en-masse.

It was this "breaking" and "socilisation" process that ultimately caused the Port Arthur event to happen, and all Martin could possibly be expected to do is reflect his True Reality. Tasmanian society created Martin, is thousands of times more malevolent than it claims Martin is. Martin has a natural True-Reality right to do as his own unique True-Reality dictates to him. If you don't like mass-murder events, don't run society in such a way that you persecute people.

Before I go into detail, we should look at the real reasons why society wants to inflict punitive punishment on Martin :

1. To threaten and terrorise all its broken citizen-slaves into refraining from expressing thier True-Reality rage outside of the constructs set up by society such as the family unit mythology structure.

What we have here is a simple threat, a facist demand, from the most criminal and malevolent entity responsible for creating criminals and ruining the lives of the citizen-slaves to obey its hypocritical commands. Societal leaders know that their threats can't possibly stop all crime and killings due to society inflicting such severe harm its citizen-slaves, mainly when they were children. However, it does work on a lot of the more broken slaves. Societal leaders also know they have to look like they are doing something. They don't dare make it an issue of thinking about the problem and its causes. Sure, sometimes they look like they do, but they act puzzled, and blame video games and other ridiculous causes that they know are irrelevant. So, they must make action instead of words, and show you those actions in effect, such as the prison holding Martin and subjecting him to further harm and punsihments.

2. The enraged and diseased social leaders also wish to personally enjoy Martins suffering, and instruct citizen-slaves to share and enjoy Martin's suffering. Not because he is a mass-murderer per se, but because most citizen-slaves are sadistic and enraged individuals and want to expound thier rage without societal moral condemnation. The Truth is that many other murders, such as war-murders, abortions, death penalty murders and so on do not attract this desire to see those responsible harmed or punished.

It is a fact that the controlled media makes regular reports about Martin being "bashed" (label used here to tell you it is societally condoned, rather than "assaulted" label) and recieves inquires in return such as "does Martin weight-train?". This is really asking : is Martin physically able to protect himself (fighting)? Or is he being helplessly and brutally bashed (tortured), as to my liking?

It also reports to you bloodthirty hypocrites every significant suffering that Martin is undergoing at the decree of society.

"Bryant would one day have to have contact with others in the maximum security section of the jail.." and "He [Bryant] must pay the price, and that is what will occur." --- Tasmanian Attorney-General Ray Groom. "....it is a pretty tough environment and things can happen. Incidents regularly happen in a prison environment - people are assaulted, and so on from time to time; people lose their lives in a prison environment." --- Tasmanian Attorney-General Ray Groom speaking about Martin Bryant. Important note : Ray Groom was acting on your behalfs when making these statements.
What we see above is an advertisement by a top-level "justice" employee of tasmanian society for illegal and wrongful assault, and possibly the murder, of your victim-creation Martin Bryant. This is from the same man who represents the society that claims that violence and killings are wrong. Not good enough, society. No wonder Martin turned out the way we did, being raised under this malevolent and evil society that will not stop killing and harming it's citizen-slaves. 3. To make Martin and any other prisoners even more of a victim than they already are - to try and "keep them mean" or to make him mentally ill/problematic to give the illusion that it's claims that Martin is "evil"/"bad"/"sick" etc. are somehow justified. The more harm done to Martin, the more "edgy" Martin is, the more angry he is, the more mentally ill he is, the more problematic he is. To thier way of thinking, the more unusual, dangerous and "bad behaviour" they can get Martin to show can be used to attempt to justify thier claims Martin is a "nut-case" and a "weirdo". 4. To punish Martin (and thereby threaten others) for showing some Forbidden Truth via his actions. Any person trying to write a book or speak to the media is able to do so. However in prison, prisoners can be legally prevented from publishing material. This reason for this is : Society's leaders know that they cannot win any argument whether it is Truth-based, or law-based, with some its prisoners or their representatives. Society cannot ultimately justify locking up and punishing prisoners. Society cannot answer to the questions put regarding the cases of some criminals - so it silences them by locking them away from media access. In Martin's case, he is being prevented from any attempt he might make to legally challenge his conviction, or express the Truth that he does not deserve his punishments. 5. To give society its "evil demon" to distract society from realising that the social leaders are the Truth-based enemy of justice. Society needs a demon, a poster-boy, to put a face that its citizen-slaves can blame thier own suffering - the suffering that society is responsible for causing. This is to try and pretend it is a few "bad" people who are responsible for the ills of society. 6. To deny Martin real, Truth-based justice, a mortal enemy of society. Society will not ever admit its responsibility and so it chooses not to solve the problems in society. In order to do this, society cannot give Martin ANY real Truth-based justice, for that means admitting fault. 7. To continue to use Martin as a poison container in a cage, for society. Tasmanian society wants to keep Martin useful as a poison-container. This is one of several reasons why Tasmanian society does not have a death penalty. I do not believe that the primary reason that Tasmanian society does not have a death-penalty is because too many citizen-slaves can see that it is wrong or are concerned with rights. All society's leaders have to do to prevent a large number of killings such as the type performed by Martin is TO TELL EVERYONE THE TRUTH. TO REPLACE THIER DEMENTED DOCTORINES WITH NEW TRUTH-BASED ONES. TO STOP INFECTING ITS CITIZEN-SLAVES WITH LIES AND BRAINWASHINGS. TO NEVER ATTACK THIER MINDS WITH LIES. TO NOT HARM CHILDREN. Simply put to run society based on the Forbidden Truth.
Society tries to claim that the punishment is a "deterrrent". This argument is insane!!! Society created all the criminals and crimes in the first place, via its deranged and malevolent policies. The idea that any human society could then have a legitimate claim that to punish its own creation will prevent future crimes is deranged. Exactly how this mechanism is supposed to work is not explained, because there could be no legitimate explanation how this derangement could work. In Truth, there is absolutely no chance that harming Martin will prevent killers of this type in the future. In fact, a True-Reality enraged to-be-killer who identified with another publically demonised killer (we will use Martin here) would feel even more outraged and victimized and even *more* like venting True-Reality rage on society. The would-be-killer would think that he is justified for any killing in his relative True-Reality (whether he actually is justified or is or not isn't issue for now) that he may choose to undertake. If he identifies with Martin (which is likely), seeing society harm Martin further would be as if society was threatening to harm him further. It would make him/her feel even more justified and enraged. So he would rightly see that the other killer whom he identifies with is being FURTHER unjustly treated. Therefore, society is planning even more unjust treatment for him too if he tries to express his True-Reality rage that society inflicted on him! Consider this : Somebody leers at your wife. You are angry at the "sleaze-bag", in your True Reality you believe that he has somehow done wrong by you as society taught you. Then society broadcasts that the "sleaze-bag" is in the "right" and that if you showed anger towards him you are "wrong" and would be punished! Would you feel more or less like attacking/abusing the "sleaze-bag"? Remember, relative to the killer, he is 100% entitled to be angry, thats why he's angry, that's why he thinks he wants to attack society, because he 100% believes/knows he is right. Threatening punishment would make someone thinking about mass-murder reactions feel even MORE enraged and victimised. *THINK* JUST THINK - The unjustness of society is the primary motivation for a killer, and a killer wants his True-Reality suffering to be acknowledged by society, and wants society to admit its responsibility for his past suffering. The would-be killer then sees a captured killer being blamed and demonised, without any real discussions or attempts to find out the Truth. Society refuses to admit that it created it's serial killer victim, and refuses to admit causing his or her suffering. He sees a captured killer being subjected to further bad treatment. What will the would-be-killer thinking? He would be further outraged! He would be even angrier. Any fines or other unjust punishments would further make the would-be-killer angrier. Its truly trying to fight fire with fire. Can you imagine a firefighting truck showing up at a apartment fire..the fireman turns on the hose ...and fire comes out?! How could the building possibly be saved by the cause of the damage? This is a great analogy : attempting to fight crime/suffering of the "victims" by inflicting harm and suffering to the person who did the crime actions (but was not responsible for them). The very victim-creation that only did the crime actions because he or she was victimised by society in the first place! It boggles My mind, it really does, how anybody seeing the increasing crime stats, let alone actually thinking, can possibly believe in the absurd "justice" system claims that it can stop crime by inflicting harm on individuals! However, even if society could prevent a future massacre by harming Martin, which it can't, society still would have absolutely no Truth-based right to harm or punish Martin in any way. Remember this : society created Martin, via its brainwashings and lies, followed up by a barrage of horrible child-abuse that it told Martin was "acceptable" via society's actions of refusing to stop harming him. Therefore, society is responsible for his actions.
	Let's take a short break to admire this beautiful and Superior creature. Wild tigers are all sane, and naturally never feel guilt for a kill. They only kill as need be, and as their specific behaviour dictates for that species. Captive tigers may attack for other reasons. If humans kept on harrassing and persecuting a tiger, it would attack humans. This has happened with tormented circus animals.
Final Words : All "criminals" great and small are tortured victim-creations of thier society that have had the internal Superiority to realise, to differing extents, that they are victims of thier society. Martin reportedly has the maturity of a two year old and the intellect of an 11 year old. There is strong evidence that Martin Bryant is mentally ill, but society still places Martin in jail. Martin has reportedly tried to take his own life several times, and has been assaulted. He is defenseless. In the words of prison officals "He is nothing without his guns." Why, then, is Martin not protected from further harm? Why is Martin in prison being subjected to punitive punishments? Why is Martin being unjustly punished to a degree that he wants to harm and kill himself? BECAUSE : Society sponsers and promotes the abuse and torture of Martin, it always has, the same way that played a part in the creation of Martin's True-Reality rage by society. Society wants Martin, and indeed all its citizen-slaves, to turn thier rage against themselves. Martin reportedly tried to kill himself. The torture is so bad, Martin would prefer death. This is PROOF that Martin, if this report is true, has unfortunately lost his self-love and does not have a truly impenatrable mental shield. Societal leaders are enjoying doing this to Martin. Social leaders want to break Martin, and indeed every single other citizen-slave, completely. It is irrelavent what Martins actions were on that fateful day. Society wants to break and hurt Martin regardless of the Port Arthur Event. What we are dealing with here is the Truth behind his courageous actions at Port Arthur are being used as a smokescreen for the real issues. There is no case whatsoever that Martin is "bad" let alone "evil" in any legitimate form whatsoever. Again : What should happen is an apology to Martin, after a TRUTH-based explanation and public aquital of Martin. He should be guided into a happy life, and society should blame society instead of Martin and put into place new doctorines so that the evil victimization and brainwashing of people like Martin cannot happen again. By apology I mean I FULL apology by the whole nations social leaders, where you BEG Martin for forgiveness on your knees and admit your folly in plain full and give Martin millions of dollars. BUT NO! Your foolish, evil society won't do that! If only you weren't all so addicted to lies, so truth-hating that Port Arthur could have been avoided. Once again, we have been shown the terrible consequences of an evil society with an evil, Truth-hating leadership. Click here to return to the top of the page. Appendix I - Did Martin do it? Forbidden Truth insights into those people who cling to conspiracy theories. The Truth is that Martin did, in fact, carry out the port arthur massacre on his own. Details as to why individuals cling to their conspiracy theories like men lost at sea cling to their life-presevers are detailed below. Indeed australian society illegally refused Martin due process and the legal right to take the matter to trial, knowing that they could get away with it because of the malicious and completely biogted Truth-hating "general public". Regardless if Martin did it or not he is legally entitled to plead as he chooses. The legal system just kept rejecting/dismissing Martins' "not guilty" pleas, while spending months pressuring, torturing and manipulating him into pleading guilty via a societal whore lawyer called John Avery (pictured in the lawyers section). His female biological creator was also used against him as a weapon, and she was all too happy to act on behalf of society. Despite rejecting his "guilty" plea, australian society and the legal system instantaneously and enthusiastically accepted his co-erced "guilty" plea, even though the earlier "not guilty" pleas were entered by Martin. Martin was illegally refused due process, just as I was years later when I was jailed as a political prisoner for publically revealing Forbidden Truths (see trials page). Australian society has accepted Martin's illegal conviction. Not one of you has filed the appropriate legal documents to challenge Martin's unlawful imprisonment, nor protested same. When you cannot justify yourselves ethically and morally, as a society, you resort to claiming that the law directs that a certain course of action "had to" take place. Of course, not only does society break the laws when it suits you sadistic cowards, but society created the laws and so it is still accountable for all legal decisions and rulings. We could, for the sake of argument, simply re-apply this scenario to mass child abuse and the family unit structure. If a child (such as Myself was) is being seriously abused, then why not just jail/remand the father, and then force his confession? (I do not suggest society should do this. Its just an example). What do you have to hide behind if you would selectively break the law? You creatures hide behind the "law" for your moral wrongs as a society, stating you "must" obey the law. The "father" in the previous example has "rights", and so you cannot act...or so you claim. Yet, with Martin, and My own legal case, we see examples where you did not follow the rule of law. Of course, the reality is that you simply don't care about Truth, justice, honesty, consistency, Martin, Myself. You as a society just want the "right" to own, shape and abuse children as you see fit, to unjustly punish those who stand against you and your insane ideologies etc.. However, although it is clear that Martin was denied a trial via unjust co-ertion and torture, it is My finding that Martin Bryant did, in fact, perform his True-Reality rage murder reactions alone during the Port Arthur event as accused. This page is about applying Forbidden Truths, the enemy of society, on the facts as they are generally reported or otherwise obtainable. The reason why some individuals believe in the port arthur conspiracy : 1. Muddled and distorted thinking. This is self-explanatory. Over 99.999% of humans are horribly corrupted and distorted in their thinking and cannot recognize Truth. Therefore, they are lead to eroneous conclusions easily. 2. Fear of the Truths surrounding such displays of mass-murder, including fear of further attacks. Fear that disgruntled individuals can show courage enough to undertake acts of True Reality based rage, and the fact that there are plenty more such individuals planning their attacks right now. Mass murder events cause wide-spread fear not only because of the attack, but the thought of future attacks. Fear that another mass-murder event will occur, and fear of the Forbidden Truths brought to the surface by the case. As usual, these pathetic cowards need to hide from the Truth. The first problem is that such large event has occurred. It would be hard to deny that this massacre occured, because there are so many concrete facts to remind them of the event. So what to do? Pretend that no individual could ever carry out such an attack on society. Delude themselves that the government did it to acheive goal "X". Now that goal "X" has been acheived, the government will not commit such an act again - at least for a long time. A feeling of safety returns. And since in their deluded minds no individual could plan and undertake such a task of such scale....there is no threat of another massacre of that magnitude in the future. At least in their delusional minds. They can rest easy again in their lies. No need to face the Truth. 3. The killer(s) violate the societal dictate that individuals are powerless against society and must obey. Society instructs that the individual cannot fight city hall, that the system will win. These individuals (murderers) defy society, they prove the individual is capable of being unbroken, of fighting. This angers and disturbs all loyal citizen-slaves as a societal instruction has been disobeyed and proven wrong. Since some individuals need to believe that we are all powerless, they cling to conspiracy theories that make the murderer seem as powerless and as much of a weak "patsy" as possible. 4. Deep down, many conspiracy clingers feel like 'losers', so they feel a need to invent "NWO" and power-conspiracy theories to delude themselves that there is some governmental conspiracy reason why they have become what society has convinced them constitutes a "loser". This way, they blame their perceived failures, weaknesses and insecurities as nothing more than massive NWO and power conspiracies and can fantasize that under normal competetive conditions, they would have been "winners". Of course, I am not suggesting the societal dictate and concepts surrounding "winners" and "losers" is correct, but these individuals falsely believe these soceital constructs are True. 5. Petty people cannot admit they are wrong. Once having invested so much in his conspiracy theory, he feels that he cannot back down and be made a fool of. There is so little esteem left in these Truth-rejecters that they have to keep denying any argument or fact that shows the error of their theory because otherwise they feel that this last blow to their sense of self-worth would destroy them. 6. In rare cases, an internet troll might pose as a conpiracy theorist and knows he is lying. He or she is simply a compulsive liar. These individuals are not actually conspiracy theorists at all, they have a different psychology. Of course, by clinging to such bizarre theories, they can also deny that society created Martin, that society itself is guilty and insane. They no longer have to face this Truth either, and so the delusional Truth-hating/fearing mind of the conspiracy theorist gets a double-whammy delusion. The bottom line is that conspiracy theories such as PAM and 9/11 do NOT represent Truth, but are pathetic lies that are desperately clinged to in order to deny Truth, or in some cases are simply the product of deranged and faulty thinking. Click here to return to where you were reading before Appendix I. Appendix II - The reception of Carleen Bryant's new book "My Story" by society, a look a forensic psychologist Wendy Northey and My own comments on the book. A link to a related newpaper article is here. The first issue that is utterly morally repugnant is that the most qualified individual in the world to write a book on his life and world-view is being prevented from doing so by his utterly insane, malevolent and diseased society. The one individual who should be encouraged and paid by australian society to write a book on the port arthur event; Martin Bryant himself; is denied this oppurtunity by his Truth-hating society. Society even forbids Martin from reading newspaper articles that relate to him, simply out of petty-minded desires to make Martin feel as low about himself as possible. This is a extreme form of fascist censorship by australian society. Serial killers and mass murderers both have valuable first-hand insights, informations and stories to tell. Society should employ Seers of Forbidden Truth, Truth-based psychologists and other valid and legitimate experts to analyze and find better ways to manage society. Notice that I said manage society, not Martin or any individual. It is important for a Truth-based society not to reverse the blame, judge or attempt to restrict the True Reality of any individual. We also see Carleen Bryant's new book has been somewhat criticized by society. This is not because of concern for the welfare of the targets or the relatives of the targets at all. Society does not care one iota about the feelings of any individual citizen-slaves. Bringing up Martin brings up Truth. Further, society is simply a anxious and worried in case Carleen has included any comments that may (unwittlingly or otherwise) reveal the blame and guilt that society bears for the port arthur event. It's that simple, people. Will Carleen Bryant's new book contain any Forbidden Truths? Absolutely not, but that does not prevent irrational citizen-slaves from worrying about it. In fact, I think that Carleen Bryant will likely try to push all the blame onto Martin, then onto his psychological syndrome because that way she can delude herself that she did not play her part in the port arthur event. More details on Carleen Bryant as they come. I am yet to purchase the book today (8th December 2010), but I will be doing so. Valuable insights into the mothers of mass murderers, psychological syndromes and denials of Forbidden Truth can be wrought from within by a Seer of Forbidden Truths. My initial opinion is that Carleen was a poor caretaker, mentally disturbed and a petty and inferior piece of humanity. I would suggest that she is also an extreme self-deluder and abused or neglected Martin severely. But thats just My impression, and until I analyze the book and other informational sources, no concrete Truths or analysis can be given. Now I will take a look at comments by psychologist Wendy Northey from the newspaper article (link at top of Apeendix II). My comments of Truth made below the quotations : ".......we want as much information as we can get for retrospective analysis." - Wendy Northey. No, she does not want as much information as possible. She only wants information as far as it does not blame society. "It's our responsibility as a community to see if we went wrong - did we slip up somewhere? Did he fall through the net?" - Wendy Northey. This comment alone proves 100% that Wendy Northey is either unable to recognize Truth, or unwilling. The notion that society might have failed Martin Bryant is utterly lie-based, ridiculous and against all the known facts. Society maliciously and deliberately failed Martin and continues to do so. Martin Bryant did not fall though the societal net - he was caught in the societal net and entanged in the lie! She then adds a further defensive lie - that even if society "went wrong" that is must somehow be an accident or "slip-up". Take the routine assaults on Martin labelled "bullying" - that was no accident. Of course, society did not "go wrong"; it implemented its various policies, institutions and insane ideologies and these went the only way such malevolent lies ever possibly could - they accumilated into disaster. The only question is what the disaster would be, and who would get the unjust blame for it to cover the collective guilt society bears. "You want as much information as you can get, particularly from his family. The more information we share, the less the risk of this happening again." - Wendy Northey. Not True. The family members are actually a very unreliable source of information. That does not mean that information should be gathered. But it should never be treated as reliable if it is geared towards blaming Martin or dneying personal guilt.For example, if Carleen spoke out against society and said she abused Martin every day (Note: I am not saying she did do that here) then her information is reliable because there is no motive for her to lie. However, if Carleen Bryant claims to be a great mother and that Martin was somehow "born bad", then we know that is not compatible with the Truth on the matter and Carleen is making a statement that presents a clear motive for lying. "Even if someone was born a monster, we need to know how to identify them and how to manage them." - Wendy Northey. But no-one can be born a monster. This clearly betrays Wendy Northey as a hack. Murderers are created by severe societal attacks and abuse. Society had to put the anger, anxiety etc onto them. Cannot be born with the emotional and psychological conditions to murder people. That simple. Killers are all tortured victim-creations of their society. Another lie-based statement is about how to identify who will do a True Reality act and "manage them". This is aimed at perverse interference and meddling in individual lives by society when society is guilty for creating the problem in the first place. This is utterly immoral and diseased. It is society and it's institutions, lies, myths and idelogical derangements that need to be identified and destroyed. "Clearly Martin Bryant needed to be better managed. We need to know: what are the early signs, how do we pick it up, and how do we manage it?" - Wendy Northey. Society will not use this knowledge to better identify the victimhood status of the killers, and compensate them. It will not use it to protect them from the initial barrage of child abuses that it subjects children to. No, society will continue these genocidal and malevolent policies and simply detect the torture victim so they can be controlled and prevented from expressing their True Reality. This is utterly perverse and insane beyond all words to describe! This is akin to punishing and restricting societal torture victims even without having to prove they undertook a crime action. This is not about preventing the initial problems and rightly blameing society at all. Has Wendy Northey revealled any Forbidden Truth in this case? Absolutely not! Her objective is simply to try and more systematically enforce the utterly perverse and insane standards of society. Click here to return to where you were reading before Appendix II.