FTM - Psychiatric Gestapo

WARNING You MUST read the disclaimer before viewing this website. If you have not read the disclaimer, you MUST click here NOW or Close your browser NOW. Truth on psychiatric gestapo and mental health care system.
This page will detail the utterly illegitimate psychiatric services that are a part of the foundations of most societies worldwide, and especially america, england, australia and israel. I will reveal that the standards as to what constitutes mental health and sanity according to society are baised, lie-based and unreliable. I will also reveal what consitutues mental health and sanity in a Truth-based way, and give examples of each. I will reveal that when such false standards are used in the mental health sphere that there is always the involvement of a Forbidden Truth in each and every issue at some level. We will begin by debunking and ridiculing an obvious fraud, who is nothing more than a patsy and a societal whore. By societal whore, I mean that this man is simply bribed by society via a "paycheck" to ensure that he reaches false conclusions that are designed to assuage the guilt that society collectively bears for creating tormented victim-creations who have chosen to undertake murders and violent crimes as a result of their life experiences living in a lie-based society.
	Who is Dr. Micheal Stone and what is his "Most Evil" television show? (Left) This is Dr. Michael Stone, a raving societal-whore who is paid bribes called "wages" by society to give insane and ridiculously false testimony on television and for court regarding certain societal torture-victims that have been hypocritically, unjustly and malevolently labeled criminal murderers by society. He is a propaganda machine. Dr Stone's theory of a "scale of evil" is completely false, unscientific, irrational, bigoted and outright ridiculous. It has no genuine scientific or psychiatric value whatsoever and are simply the reflective construct of Dr. Stone's lie-based and deranged moral value system as he was taught by his utterly demented and malevolent society. It seems likely that Dr. Stone superficially believes his own drivel, however I think at some level that Dr Stone is pretentiously taking to the role that society gave him because he needs to feel like an important and competent professional. He knows that it is his job to lie, he knows that his continued income and thus his luxuries rely on him siding with society and telling everyone what they want to hear.
Dr. Michael Stone's title of "forensic psychiatrist". You may recognize societal-whore Stone from the television series "most evil", the subject of Seer Travis' Truth TV Episode 11. Stone is given the ludicrous title of "forensic" psychiatrist. What does that mean? Well, there is only one field of study in psychiatry - that being psychiatry itself. A forensic psychiatrist is simply a normal psychiatrist who has been carefully selected to work and comment on criminal court cases, as well as give evidence at those cases. The criteria claimed by society and authorities is that a forensic psychiatrist is less naive and more insightful and experianced in dealing with criminals personally. Is that claim True? No, it is patently untrue. Lets take a look at precisely why it this claim is false. Notice that I give a concise and detailed reason that is objective and logical when I make arguments, unlike society that resorts to irrational nonsense, abuse, name-calling and other illegitimate responses. Firstly, a psychiatrist who sees a criminal patient is still assessing a human being. The principals and concepts of psychiatry are still the same, such as that of the poison container. Forensic and ordinary psychiatrists both have one thing in common on their forst day of the job - They have no experiance with criminal patients. Therefore, why should it matter if a forensic psychiatrist or a regular psychiatrist is assessing the criminal patient? They both have no experiance...and both types would gain said experiance. So it simply cannot matter. Second, forensic psychiatrists are simply the most gullible, un-insightful societal sheep that have shown both a willingness to blindly follow the decrees of society in return for continuing paycheck-bribes to testify false and lie-based analysis of individuals in court. This is proven by endless cases of testimony by "established" forensic psychiatrists where criminals are deemed mentally ill when not, and vice versa (example is Theodore Kaczynski declared insane for no reason and Martin Bryant deemed mentally fit to serve in an adult prison when he clearly was not). These forensic psychiatrists are usually average in their field at best, but enjoy an artificially inflated status as being well-paid and respected psychiatrists when as said earlier the complete opposite is True. In other words, they are eager to be in the pocket of the utterly immoral and invalid justice system. This is what makes them a societal whore. How can a psychiatrist who gives obviously false or incorrect testimony or conclusions of individuals he interviews be any justification that they are more insightful in assessing individuals for the legal system? They are either more dishonest or they were plain wrong. And this is what adds up as their experiance as a so-called forensic psychiatrist. So, in conclusion, there is no reason why a forensic psychiatrist should be seen as better than a normal psychiatrist. They are just more bigoted and set in their often false and invalid theories and ideas than another psychiatrist may be. Certainly, like scientists, it should be about the justification for their findings, and this method should matter - not an appeal to authority of being a so-called forensic psychiatrist demi-god.
Precise debunking and ridicule of Dr Michael Stone and his "scale of evil" theory. Dr. Stone, on his program "most evil", claims to analyze criminal behaviour. Claims include that he : 1. "Examines the criminal mind with breakthrough science and psychological analysis". 2. Has created a scale of evil that measures the "evil" in criminals 3. He also presumes that all the current societal claims regarding what constitues a crime, fairness, justice and the myth of personal responsibility to society is valid and thus makes this claim by default. These claims are a joke. He is not examining the mind at all, nor is he using science in any of his investigations. His "scale of evil" is nothing more than a deranged and ridiculous invention used in an attempt to deny the concrete psychiatric evidence of child abuse and trauma causing crime and criminal acts. He is trying to take the blame from where it rightly belongs (society) and reverse it onto the individual criminal, even resorting to phantom and mystical belief systems. There is absolutely no rational basis or evidence for Dr. Stone's deranged claims. Dr Stone's claims that he measures "evil" in individuals are simply insane. Firstly, he does not and cannot detect or define "evil" directly. Second, he simply "borrows" the claims made by society regarding what consitutes a crime and criminal responsibilty, even though these concepts are illegitimate, as I proved in the crime essay. "Evil" is actually a fairy-tale, lie-based and utterly un-scientific concept. Science is the objective study of nature using numbers, data and repeatable testing. For Dr. Stone to then adopt a false, lie-based concept such as individual "evil" is unscientific, and his later use of a numerical "scale" of such a concept does nothing to diminish the Truth that the whole premise of what the numbers are supposed to represent in their measure is unscientific, presumptuous, culturally biased, utterly insane and logically fallacious. He tried in later episodes to remedy this by suggesting that "evil" was "community disgust" at the crime acts, thus his scale is the level of community disgust at the actions of criminals. This is completely ridiculous. He is interviewing a specific individual supposedly to get insight into his mind and criminality, via a measurement of the level of community disgust at these crimes, but that cannot possibly be a property of the subject he is interviewing! Perhaps he should interview the community instead :-). He is just basing his research on the un-informed and ignorant knee-jerk reaction of the mass of citizen-slaves to the details of the crime acts. In other words, the basis for his theory is general ignorance and societal lies. Community disgust is not even remotely a scientificaly measureable thing, and neither is it valid in psychiatric evaluation. Dr. Stone's premise, on which every single one of his conclusions rest, simply commits an appeal to numbers fallacy, where he just illogically presumes that what the "general public" consider to be "evil", "disgusting" must be correct and accurate, and that can then be used as a solid basis of investigation. How utterly ridiculous! He is just allowing society to dictate its false morals, insane ideologies and false dogmas to him via the citizen-slaves. He just blindly plows on, ignoring the obvious faulty basis of his argument. Stone is really just looking at the crime act itself, and the motivations for the act, and comparing that to what his society tells him is acceptable. So he is really just recycling the already invalid claims made by society and the criminal justice system into a new format. What is more, he ignores the fact that his very source for this "evil" is society, and yet society commits all the crime acts itself, as I reveal in the crime essay. Stone also attempts to use remorse, intent, planning, indifference, selfishness as indicators of the "level of evil". Now, he may a times be accurate in determining these traits in various criminals. However, it matters how Stone interprets these results, because these are just inverse versions of the level of Mental Freedom, recognition of Truth, Self Love and objective amorality that characterized those Superiors who are actually sane, rational and un-effected by societal lies and conditioning. He does nothing to explain why he supposed that various values themselves are legitimate/illegitimate in the first place. That was done by society. One obvious example is seen in the level 1 on his scale. Level 1 of "evil" is an individual who kills someone in self-defense, even though that would be a rational, sane and natural thing to do. Another example is where Stone attributes lesser "evil", and thus less unjust and undeserved punishment, to the exact same acts just because they were married and thus part of the illegitimate family unit structure mythology. This is utterly insane! Stone is so culturally biased and un-objective that he cannot even keep his own claims consistant! Why should such a thing matter? It makes no sense! Of course, the greatest fault is that all the claims regarding justice and crime made by societies are invariably false, insane, hypocritical and false. Stone is in no position to claim that society has any right to ajudge or punish any criminal, and he can give no scientific or legitimate and solid philisophical reasoning for this recurring theme that crime is a legitimate concept, psychopaths are sick, people are responsible to society for their behaviour and so on. Society claims via the media that "A depravity rating that measures evil and will help courts decide whether convicted murderers should face execution or just imprisonment has been drawn up by American psychiatrists." The Truth here is that the depravity scale decides nothing, Dr. Stone just simply decrees that evil exists and that it can be measured without basis. It is society and societal leaders who have decided, and then handed that down to the legal courts and forensic psychiatrists. What is even more utterly insane and malevolent, however, is that this drivel is being used to attempt to justify the unjust and undeserved punishments and even the outright murder of societally created abuse victims that have arbitrarily demonized and labelled criminals. This is utterly morally perverse and just insane. There has never been a single legitimate reason, let alone justification, to punish or harm criminals. Notice how the latest attempts to justify the punishment of criminals is based on nothing but irrational drivel - in fact the same irrational drivel. How does a "scale of evil" "help courts decide" anything? All Stone did was take the insane justice-system and related societal and baseless claims, apply it in varying degrees to individual cases and then pronounce that the theory was somehow proven or shown to be reliable. But it was not only unproven, but presented without a single shred of legitimate evidence for this insane theory what-so-ever. You cannot measure something that is irrational, false or does not exist. *Just look at how ridiculous Dr. Stone's method* is*. Take an analogy of people who get speeding tickets. Speeding tickets are legalized extortion, but society wants to lie and pretend it is a "road safety issue". Society needs to demonize the everyday speeder, in order to make the matter about irrational emotion-driven thought. For the sake of the example, let's say that society invents a label to demonize the speeding act, and claims that speeders are "zevil". Of course, there is no such thing* as "zevil", they just made it up because they want to demonize the speeders and reject all rational and legitimate analysis. We then "study" 100, 000 speeders and conclude they all have common traits, "excuses", and common acts (speeding). We then "rate" the speeders on a scale of "zevil". Of course, "zevil" never came into it. It was just irrationally invented and thrust onto a make-believe scale - and that scale only exists because "zevil" is presumed to exist. Yet it concludes that "zevil" exists because it is on the scale of "zevil" and/or people speed. This method is just deranged and irrational. And yet this is the exact same method as Dr. Stone uses in his utterly demented "scale of evil". And despite all of this, Dr. Stone's programme is actually accepted and popular, whereas the Forbidden Truth such as revealed on this glorious website it rejected and shunned. Pathetic! That teaches the student of Truth that Truth is ugly, it is unpopular - where as sensationalism is always going to attract the interest of many.
How society uses forensic psychiatrists and "psyche-nurses" as Societal Conformity Gestapo - including an example in the Theodore Kaczynski case. Now that we have seen how forensic psychiatrists are an invalid authority, and what a ridiculous crack-pot Dr. Stone is, we will now discuss what I call the Gestapo Aspect to the mental health service. These Psyche-Gestapo are used primarily in psychiatric prisons, normal prisons, and to arrest and "section" people in the community areas and their homes as ordered by societal authorities. They often target sane and rational individuals who reject the lies and myths of society, and ignore genuinely insane and deranged human beings who really could do with counselling and help. They act as a kind of police/jailing system for those who have no committed a crime, but whom society wishes lock away under some false pretense. They are also used to renounce and declare individuals insane, often those who reveal societally Forbidden Truths as I do. At the same time, some extreme god-addicts are declared to be sane and rational individuals who are mentally healthy, who are actually completely deranged. So, the standards of who is said to be sane or insane are ridiculous and false. The method used is not an open and scrutinized repeatable testing method such as in science. It is a closed, internal and authority-based method. The authority, in this case the forensic psychiatrist, simply declares or announces that an individual is insane or otherwise mentally deranged but cannot prove or justify his claim. We are meant to just take his word for it, because he is a forensic psychiatrist, but philosophers of Truth must never allow themselves to be fooled by such confidence tricks and lies. This process is not only malevolently used for locking people into prisons, but it is also used to deny bail, keep prisoners past their release date on the grounds that they are suddenly interested in helping them recover by locking them in prison for longer, and of course discrediting individuals philsophies, complaints etc. They are also used to analyze the prisonsers, to try and gain control and leverage over them. For example, Seer Theodore Kaczynski is a sane, rational and solid philsopher of Forbidden Truth. His work on autonomy/freedom and the technology question is excellent. There is no reason to believe he is mentally ill, let alone insane. Many bombers, terrorists and muerderers are not insane, and not declared insane by societal whore forensic psychiatrist. However, society's inability to defend itself against Ted's social criticism has led society to simply declare Ted "mentally ill" in order to discredit him. I have examined the reasons given and they dont make any sense. Foresntic Psychiatrist societal-whores simple declared Ted insane or mentally ill, without even giving any solid evidence or reasoning as to why. Some have delcared him insane before they even interviewed Ted. The simple reason that society does this is because of fear of Forbidden Truth. By dis-crediting Theodore personally, they hope to dis-credit his philisophical insights and critiques of society. By declaring Ted insane, they hope to make Ted unpopular and shunned, they hope to convince you to shun his philisophical insights and critiques of society. The Theodore Kaczynski file has more details on this atrocity.
A personal story - using psychiatric gestapo to attempt to silence Seer Travis and his revelations of Forbidden Truth. I Myself have been the subject of a series of societal attempts to put Me out of action. We will see one such particular instance below.

	These societal whores are "forensic psychiatrists" used against Seer Travis Introductions are in order. The top photo features Paul Mullen, and the bottom one Ruth Vine, and both were top-level "forensic psychatrists" who regularily worked in the prison faucility when I was being held as a political prisoner without bail or a trial. Ruth Vine is an inferior, a citizen-slave who is absolutely beholden to society. Don't not let her smile and small stature sway or deceive you. Mullen had limited contact, but was dogged in his determination to try and harrass Me into a getting an interview with Me to discuss a Forbidden Truth based website printout. I have no doubt that the objective of these societal whores was to attempt to place a hospital order on Me, so they could lock Me away. However, I used My knowledge of Forbidden Truth, and with a little luck on My side, managed to prevent this atrocity from being carried out. Society would love to lock Me away for good, under the smoke-screen of "helping" Me and "protecting the community", while declaring Me mentally ill.

I will start with Ruth Vine, who is in fact a nosy woman and a liar. Vine was asked to do a psychiatric report for a criminal court case I was involved in at the time. She initially did not know anything about Me in particular, except from the brief of evidence. This brings Me to a small detour, the proedure of forensic psychiatric evaluations on prisoners for court. Forensic psychiatists are always given a copy of the court case documents and allegations. The legitimate purpose of any psychiatric evaluation would be to evaluate the personality and aspects and diagnose any psychiatric illness or emotional disturbance in the subject. And yet, the major focus of nearly every question that Vine asked Me was related to the criminal charges, namely questions to determine legal guilt or legal innocence. So, this was really a fact-finding mission, a legal probe rather than a medical or scientific one. I have some doubts as to whether or not she already knew who I was claimed to be - a Seer of Forbidden Truth. At this time she gave no indication. certainly, the last six months I was the target of an intensive campaign of pig-thug and court persecution. Be that as it may, Vine did the interview, and I nailed it. I was even witty and funny, and she laughed at the joke I cracked. Vine just seemed to ask questions of a legal nature. One thing I did notice was how absolutely biased and bigoted she was in favour of the police and legal system. I do not think this was just some tactic or test, but she really believes in the pig-thug and court authorities. Here is an example : Vine : "So, what is this about Police harrassment? You claim that the police had no case?" Me : [explains some] "The Police actually did not have a warrant to search My house on that occasion. The search was illegal, the cops just smashed My door in. In court they admitted that there was no reason to search My house, and no warrant. They were on a fishing expedition". Vine : "Ok. But why should they have a warrant? You claim that you have done nothing illegal at that time, so why not just open the door and let them in to search?" Me : "Why should I? They were violent, aggressive and police had previously made a death-threat (which I taped). They don't have a warrant, and so why should I let them in? What is the advantage to Me? I am legally entitled not to let them in. Put it this way- what what you do if you got woken up late at night, you are alone, and the cops are banging on your door as yelling to open it up when they have no warrant?". Vine : "I would just open the door and let them in to search my house." Me : "Really? You wouldn't mind being woken up and having your house illegally ransaked?" Vine : "I have done nothing illegal, so I have nothing to hide. I'd be happy to assist the police. You, however, seem to have issues with the police doing that." Me : "Well, I would not let them in. I'd suggest you should do the same. They might assault you, or plant evidence, steal something or something. They have done that to Me." Vine : "The Police don't do those things. You must be doing something very wrong if the police are acting like that towards you. They must have a reason to act that way towards you." This is a good example of how biased forensic psychiatic prison staff are. Vine wrote a negative over-toned report, even though I made no error. She admitted that she could find no apparent signs of mental illness or delusion. Nor did I present Myself badly. Yet, she claimed I came across as "cold" and "distant" and "without humour", even though she involentarily laughed at My spontaneous and smoothly delivered joke. She also claimed that she did not find My explanations to the legal charges to be clear enough, or believeable. Why exactly is she even making comment on the evidence and legal case at all? She clearly had an agenda to simple find anything out and make a report to help the police case against bail, and she did little to no psychiatric and personal tests or evaluaion at all. Vine made the report as much as a stretch towards the unfavourable as she could make it. She then was given a set of computer printouts, relating to a Forbidden Truth Website such as this one. It was alleged by police that I ran that website, or at least part of it. All the authorities involved admitted freely that the website was not related to the criminal charges. Authorities then ordered a second psychiatric interview with Vine, and at this point no longer accepted the forensic report I already had from Vine, even though it was by their "man", and not a defence psychiatrist. At this second interview, Vine simply asked questions like a police interview as to attempt to determine whether or not I ran the website. I refused to conduct the interview, and I told her this right away, and that she had already made her report about Me. I told her she evaluates Me, not the website or who may run it. Vine then produced a second extremely negative report, considering what limited material she had from Me. It was then dictated that no information in court would be allowed from the Vine report (this report was written FOR the court at it's request), and the contradictory "new" report would be used until I agreed to answer all their questions about the website allegations to the prison psychiatrist Vine. Further, no bail would be granted unless questions about the website were answered and a "confession" about who ran it made, despite there being no proof I ran it or not. This is an example of how the system works - they clearly wanted that interview and assessment of that website and wanted to use it against Me.
I now move on to the actions of Professor Mullen. Professor Mullen was also given the website printout. He was engaged after the senencing phase, when I has passed beyond the "half way" mark of the sentence. He was like a dog with an old shoe - he would not stop harrassing Me and pursuing Me - with a copy of My file and the website printout in hand, of course. I outright refused to even enter his office, to even consider an interview with him. I have no doubt that his objective was to put a "hospital order" on Me and lock Me up for good (or at least a long, long time). He even resorted to lies, and attempting to fake a report by claiming I had had an interview with him when I had not. Lets take a look at what he did : After being transfered to a different prison, I was taken to Professor Mullen's office to answer website related questions. I had not been told about this, there was no warning nor reason given, no court reports needed and so on. I refused the interview, knowing that My sentence was going to be up in a little over 18 months or so. I did not want to risk being hospital ordered, or being pumped full of drugs, or being ordered to take drugs on My release. After all, I had nothing to gain nor anything I wanted from Mullen, so it made perfect sense to refuse. The officers tried to bully and bull Me into the interview with Mullen, but I refused. I was taken to a holding cell. I had to go around the prison at times for various reasons because I was a new arrival, and this seemed to take Me into Mullen's presence a suspicious 100% of the time. At one point, Mullen would bump into Me in corridors, as I said earlier, co-incidently holding My file and trying to bowl Me into an interview with him. He tried every persuations and acting job he could...he tried to suggest I just go into the room and then I could refuse...but of course then he could say otherwise, so I refused. It was blindingly obvious that Mullen was determined to get answers about that Truth-based website printout. I have no doubt his objective was to try and get Me declared mentally ill and locked up for longer or knocked out on so-called medications. I was then taken out to another special level of the prison and placed in a extra-harsh solitary confinement even though I did nothing against the prison rules to warrant it. I was allowed only a smock, no underwear, socks, clothes, food, books or any other items. I dont think there was a TV, either, but I am not certain. I was starved, being fed bread and water and little else. The cell was half the size or so of a normal cell, and normal bedding and foam mattress was not allowed. I was told I would remain in this detention for as long as it took to make me speak to psychiatrists. I told them I still refused and that I would spend the rest of My sentence in that cell if need be and boy did I mean that. I was taken the next day or so to another prison unit, where friendly tactics and encounters were tried to try and persude Me into an interview. This continued for months, before they somewhat gave up and sent Me back to normal mainstream prison areas.

This Forbidden Truth website is Copyright 2008 - 2099 of it's webmaster Seer Travis Truman. All rights reserved. Images herein are Copyright of their respective owners. You may not re-produce material herein without the written permission of the author.

free counters

Forbidden Truth Media

Webmasters : Earn money by placing a banner-link on your website. Click here for more information.