FTM - Truth on war ritual

*WARNING* You MUST read the disclaimer before viewing this website. If you have not read the disclaimer, you MUST click here NOW or Close your browser NOW.

The Forbidden Truth on the insane and genocidal ritual of war.

Introduction
War is a top-tier Forbidden Truth. The Forbidden Truth on war invokes extremely high levels of fear, terror and hatred of Truth in the minds of the citizen-slaves. In other words, it is one of the most sensitive topics to a citizen-slave. There are many important Forbidden Truths about the intentions and psychological condition of societies and societal leaders that can be realised by analysis of the war ritual, and these Truths are highly valuable to anyone seeking Truth.

The Truth is that war is actually a societally-sponsored form of ritual mass-murder committed by a society for emotional and psychological motivations related the psychological concept of a poison-container. War is not primarily motivated by money, greed or political goals. Societal leaders simply use their control over the citizen-slaves to commit acts of mass murder for personal reasons.

Society always claims that wars are "unavoidable", "justifiable" or that there can be a legitimate utilitarian purpose/need to engage in wars. This is simply a total lie, which I will prove in detail in this essay. I will explain exactly why the claims made by societies about their supposed motivations for war are false, and why psychological-based reasons must be True. I will then reveal the philisophical ramifications of what the societal sponsorship of war entails, and explain why every current and previous system of society is utterly illegitimate, malevolent and insane. I will then reveal how today's societies are more immoral, deranged and unjust than any society in history. I will also explain and detail what society would need to do to stop war, how society can easily do so and simply chooses not to do so because it wants to engage in and reveal in mass murder of demonised foreign citizen-slaves.

What motivates society to start a war?
The primary reason why societies launch wars against other societies is due to psychological and emotional issues they collectively harbour, not for utilitarian reasons such as theft and avoiding wars. The claim that wars are ruthless and violent acts, based in an extention of natural battles, to obtain money and goods in simply a societal lie driven by a pathological and obsessive need to deny their real core motivations for war. This pathological drive and denial is a very important Truth to realise. Society fears Truth, it hates and fears Truth so much it refuses to acknowlede the societal motivations for war. Society is guilty of murder via war.

We will now examine quotes and video by expert psychohistorian Llyod DeMause, who has done some objective and insightful reasearch into child abuse and war, including his insightful work "The Origins of War and Social Violence in Early Traumas".

"Oh, it [war] must be because nations want to steal from each other, utilitarian purposes....Wrong! Just simply historically wrong. I will give a prize to anyone who shows me a major nation who went to war and got anything out of it. Do you really think that Adolf Hitler declared war against the five biggest countries in the world that were much more huge and powerful than him because he though he was going to get something? He did it because he was suicidal." - Llyod DeMause. Click here for the video. [Note : In addition to Victim Adolf being suicidal, he also reflected his immense murderous rage and frustrations over his traumatic childhood and overbearing mother.]

Llyod is clearly spot on : "utilitarian" causes cannot explain the motives for war. They just do not fit the known historical facts about war. Wars often bring the nation to the brink of bankruptcy, and make most people poor and miserable. They deplete the resources of the nation, and thus deplete the wealth of societal leaders. It is a fact, that I have pointed out in the past many times, that during WWII the society of england was going broke. Even iron railings meant for trains were being melted down to try and fuel the war effort. There were extreme food and basic goods shortages. Today's wars, such as those launched by america, have resulted in severe debts and budget deficits. Take the vietnam war. What possible utilitarian gain could there be? There was none!

Take the ultra-diseased society of australia. As recently as I am writing (October 2010), we see australia engaged in the insane ritual of war (click here for article), where the cost is at least 1.7 billion dollars a year. Anyone who cannot recognize that wars and the military cost nations a great percentage of their wealth and resources, and thus are not utilitarian approaches to make money via theft, is either stupid, insane or in severe denial.

We also hear about "pre-emptive strikes", "protecting the people" and "peace". Ha! These explanations of war are simply ridiculous! Wars endanger and kill extremely large groups of people, who would otherwise not have been in any danger what-so-ever had the war not been engaged in. You cannot justify what you do by what you may (or may not) believe might happen in the future. Consider an analogy to this concept of war in your dealing with neighbors. Imagine if you are not under attack from your neighbor. You then decide to launch a "pre-emptive" or "defensive strike" against this neighbor, for the supposed purpose of preventing trouble and safe-guarding your person.

You invade his territory, and strike him with a plank of wood, and smash some of his property. You then return home. (Of course, if you did this and claimed self-defence, society would hypocritically you would be labelled mentally deranged and punished for attacking others.) You have endangered your safety, both directly and by starting a fued with your neighbor. No sane and sensible person could possibly come to the conclusion that this behaviour is rationally designed to achieve the stated goal, as it directly contradicts it's purpose. And yet, this is exactly what america (and other societies) claim is a rationally designed form of defence! For example, Society the invasion of iraq was to "protect" human beings "just in case" of iraq possessing weapons of mass destruction that it might one day choose to deploy against america! It simply ensured the murderous slaughter of thousands of human beings, and has given iraq provacation for decades to come. The hypocrisy and mental derangement of societal claims that wars are for peace or protection is amazing!

No, these societal explainations of war are a malevolent lie. So, now I will reveal what the motivations for war really are. It is important to realise for this purpose that war is an aggressive feud started between societal leaders of countries, not between countries. The so-called "enemy" and simply victims of their own society, who have not directly interacted with or persecuted any of the other "side". No, society is responsible for the victimization of it's own citizen-slaves, not someone in a far away land. However, this gives societal leaders a motive to have some foreign nation as a scape-goat for the problems of their own society. Society is always claiming that their society is the "good" one, and the problems come from an "enemy" and "bad" society. They claim that only their society and way of life represents Truth, decency, "freedom" and "justice", while the other demonized society does not have these values. Of course, neither society based on Truth, decency, freedom and justice.

For a short break, I have decided to include some lyrics from the band "Metallica". I have always found Metallica to generally have Truth-based lyrics. He we see reference to the war ritual, and the expected role of "soldiers", which is the next topic.

Disposable Heroes (part).

I was born for dying

Life planned out before my birth, nothing could I say
Had no chance to see myself, molded day by day
Looking back I realise, nothing have I done
Left to die with only friend
Alone I clench my gun

Soldier boy, made of clay
Now an empty shell
Twenty one, only son
But he served us well
Bred to kill, not to care
Just do as we say
Finished here, Greeting Death
He's yours to take away

Back to the front
You will do what I say, when I say
Back to the front
You will die when I say, you must die
Back to the front
You coward
You servant
You blindman

Back to the front.

The societal leader is sick
Societal leaders that launch wars are all conquering-type personalities, who harbour a deep rage, trauma and often self-hatred at the core of their own True Reality because of their traumatic and abusive childhoods alongside ideological and mental derangements. Like mass murderers and serial killers, they seek outlets for this rage and anger against human beings. Unlike normal killers, societal leaders don't use their own hands or a weapon to do their desired murders, but instead deploy their conditioned and controlled citizen-slaves as living weapons against their personal "enemy" leader and "enemy" society. At the same, despite verbal denials, the general mass of citizen-slaves embrace and are delighted that their leaders choose to murder human being on their behalf. By deluding themselves they don't support war, they can revel in mass-murder, rape and brutalization of human beings without feeling any excessive conscious guilt.

So-called "soldiers" (and even the ridiculous label of "diggers" in australia) are actually living breathing citizen-slaves being used as literal weapons by societal leaders, in order to commit acts of mass murder on the behalf of society. Soldiers are simply considered expendable human fodder to be sacrificed as need be in order to murder complete strangers in so-called "enemy" societies. "Soldiers" are often just children. Despite what society tells you, human beings are often not adults until 28 years of age. Sometimes more. Society convinces them that they should undertake mass-murder of complete and total strangers and risk their own lives, both mentally and psychologically.

The label, or term, of "soldier" is used to dehumanise the individual by society. As law-abiding "citizens" cannot be murdered, murder other human beings, or be placed in mortal jeopardy by the government, society has chosen to try and circumvent this sharp contradiction by simply refering to certain individuals as "soldiers" instead of "citizens". And this ploy actually works! A soldier is in fact nothing more than a citizen-slave who is a tortured victim-creation of thier society. As a "soldier", he is a living and breathing weapon, the ultimate weapon. He is the weapon of the society and societal leadership that he is a member of.

As I briefly mentioned before, australian "soldiers" are often referred to as "diggers", in order to portray a light and friendly picnic-type image to them. This is utterly ridiculous! There orders are not to dig holes at all. They are not equiped with shovels, but deadly weapons. This label is simply a second-layering of lies. A Truth-based term would be something along the lines of a "societal child-weapon".

Indeed, other lie-based labels are deployed by society specifically for the ritual of war. The fact that societies insist on using such dishonest terminology is a direct result of the aforementioned societal guilt and denial it bears over its chosen acts of mass murder.

Such labels like "engaged" in war are designed to pretend that individuals, who are being used as living weapons, are "stuck" in the war, almost like they are somehow fused to the "enemy" territory. This is to create an illusion that somehow the soldier "has to" continue with the war or battle once he started. We often hear that a so-called "withdrawal" takes several years, even though the "deployment" (=murderous attack) phase is acheived in under a week. This is another lie, there is no "withdrawal", there is only a deliberate continuation of mass murder under the insane and ridiculous excuse of "withdrawing" from war.

"A theatre of operations" is used by societal leaders to make the war sound like a play or performance, for the entertainment of citizen-slaves. The word "operations" is used instead of the Truth-based words such as 'murder' and 'genocide' to mask the fact that these operations are in fact acts of killing and slaughtering human beings.

Society always begins its genocidal wars with propoganda and demonizing campaigns to generate false justifications for launching brutal murderous attacks against foreign citizen-slaves. These foreign victims are also told the same thing in reverse by their societal leaders. They tell you to consider foreign people or groups your "enemy".

Of course, the so-called "enemy" are complete strangers and therefore are not responsible for the tortured lives of the "soldiers". They cannot possibly be the enemies of the soldier, but they are both convinced and threatened to attack these strangers by society. The notion of the patriot, or loyalty to the nation, is lie-based and ridiculous. It is the soldiers' own society that victimized them not the "ememy" society, and thus there is no more need to be loyal to society than to be loyal to a stranger who abuses you for no good reason. You won't get any "loyalty" in return, as vietnam veterans experianced upon their return. Societal leaders are actually perfectly happy for soldiers to die obeying their orders. In fact, the whole point of war is that they die. They must die to that the enraged and self-loathing citizen-slaves and their insane leaders can experience release and obtain their emotional and psychological objectives.

They use the ritual of war to obtain this. This is what wars are, ritualistic killings, instigated by societal leaders. Just as the mother often uses her children as a poison container, so too do societal leaders and their citizen-slaves use wars to cleanse (or attempt to) their emotional and psychological states. They simply use a percentage of their children and less-productive citizen-slaves as weapons to create the carnage they crave to alleviate their emotional rage and return to emotional homeostatis.

This is the Forbidden Truth : War is simply a conflict between two genocidally-enraged individuals who happen to be the leaders of a society by using their loyal citizen-slaves as weapons. War is used as a form of cathartic release for the societal leader and the masses of citizen-slaves. They are using children to commit acts of mass murder on their behalf in order to assuage this genocidal-rage. In lay-man terms, war makes you all emotionally and psychologically feel better and relieves your problems. So deep is this need to commit mass-murder that there has a war ritual virtually every year for the past century. Nearly all citizen-slaves cannot face this Truth, they are all in denial over this Truth, so wars all have to be arranged carefully under various smoke-screens and guises.

Of course, some people as individuals are keen to go to war and kill strangers, due to the intense victimization they suffered as children. The war-mongering leaders do realise, just as they are enraged, that there are plenty of enraged citizen-slaves who, if not given the opportunity to vent their rage overseas either via their children or sometimes even in person, would attack the leaders' own society.

Society simply redirects these violent impulses from itself and onto other societies, who are not even to blame at all. This keenness is due to the fact that the citizen-slave realizes that he will now be given the legal permission of his society to kill other human beings. It is the bloodthirsty urge, that homicidal rage that motivates many citizen-slaves to kill complete strangers under the moral smokescreen that they are "serving country and righteousness". By allowing these legal murder oppurtunities, the societal leaders not only provide a much needed outlets for the collective rage and violence of the citizen-slaves, but also gain security and popularity as leader by satisfying the supressed murderous needs and desires of the citizen-slaves. They realise their prospects as leader are in jeopardy if there are no wars.

Some of you may be thinking "Well, I am not angry. I do not feel enraged". The Truth is the vast majority of citizen-slaves in societies are frustrated, enraged, suicidal or homicidal. This rage is suppressed, it is not normally experienced consciously. It remains dormant, but potent. It is only released when society gives the citizen-slave a false "moral" permission to release it. Often I see people accepting brutal and genocidal wars, trying to justify or excuse them. And yet when an individual such as Timothy McVeigh commits the exact same actions as society does during wars, you instantly claim these acts are wrong, crazy and unjustifiable! You would presume Tim was "wrong" to do so, and more importantly that he must have had malicious intent by undertaking such actions. But the actions are exactly the same! Why not presume Tim had the "right idea" and society has the malicious intent? This is not to try and suggest anything about Tim's chosen acts, but to show you how society's claims regarding motivation and intent are inherantly linked to the actions themselves, and so they are just being conviently selective about declaring who's murders are supposedly justifiable and "right" and who's murders are not.

Note : It is not My intention to suggest that literally every single person is so sub-consciously enraged, but obviously the vast majority are due to the support of the war ritual and popularity of war-mongering presidents and societal leaders.

Society simply deploys a demonization tactic and denies it obvious hypocrisy, and you loyal members of society are all too happy to lap it up. "That other country does not have freedom" or "That society has a slightly different version of the god myth than we do" are all wafer-thin but effective ways of convincing the brainwashed masses that the other humans beings are somehow worthy to be killed, shot and pillaged.

It always strikes Me how many simularities there are between the war ritual and hunting. Hunting and war are both forms of legal murder that society has invented in order to satisfy the rage and blood-lust of citizen-slaves, often using firearms and other weapons.

Both the "enemy" and the hunted animals are demonized by society in such a way that they are incorrectly seen of lesser/no worth and value. The same general principals apply, with the main difference being that a different target group is chosen by society.

Society still needs to generate justification for the murder of animals, in order to keep up it's delusion that it is decent, sane and moral. Since society cannot claim the sort of excuses that are used for war, such as that animals might launch an organized attack against society, it simply claims that it is a "sport" designed to entertain and get rid of "pests". Predictably, the un-thinking masses blindly embrace this shallow societal lie, without so much as subjecting it to any form of legitimate rational analysis.

Sometimes even this is not enough, so society invents demented, ridiculous and completely insane "reasons" such as :

1. "There are too many of this type of animal".
2. "These types of animals are attacking other types, so we must protect them by killing the other animal".
3. "It's humane to kill this animal, because they are suffering".

I will not be examining the "reasons" here, simply because this page is for the Truths of war. These Truths will be presented on the animals page. I just mearly point out here how society demonizes specific groups it targets for organized mass-murder in order to generate an illusion of justification. Lets take a short picture break now, before we continue.


Just some of the machines built for the mass murder of humans by societal leaders and society. The tank, for example, is specifically designed to murder human beings.		Above : Society threatens to destroy the environment and maybe even the life on Earth due to its deranged and utterly immoral addiction to war and lies.

We move on from the hunting analogy I presented just before the picture break to some words from Theodore Kaczynski on war. "Its is important, too, to realise that deadly violence among primitives is not even remotely comparable to modern warfare. When primitives fight, two little bands of men shoot arrows or swing war-clubs at one another because they want to fight; or because they are defending themselves, their families, or their territory. In the modern world soldiers fight because they have been brainwashed into believing in some kook ideology such as that of Nazism, socialism, or what American politicians choose to call "freedom". In any case the modern soldier is merely a pawn, a dupe who dies not for his family or his tribe but for the politicians who exploit him. If he's unlucky, maybe he does not die but comes home horribly crippled in a way that would never result from an arrow- or a spear-wound. Meanwhile, thousands of non-combatants are killed or mutilated. The environment is ravaged, not only in the war zone, but also back home, due to the accelerated consumption of natural resources needed to feed the war machine. In comparison, the violence of primitive man is relatively innocuous." - Theodore Kaczynski.

Theodore makes some important points here.

1. Society is getting worse and growing more toxic and destructive as time goes on.
2. The level and consequences of wars are getting more serious, espcially as "bully beater" bio weapons are around the corner.
3. Even though even primitive wars are involved with childhood and cultural motivators, there is a different dynamic at play in "primitive" battles.

The only legitimate, sane and excusable form of war-type battle would be to protect your territory and lives against direct invasion-based attack from an aggressor. The defenders are only justified when they must defend against those directly attacking them for them to have a legitimate, utilitarian and rational basis for their actions. Under this scenario, primitive battles may well be naturalistic and neccesary for the defending side, because their actions come as a direct sesult of the aggresssors actions. However, no modern day war by any western nation fits into this catagory. Oftentimes, societies will claim to launch wars to protect foreign societies, but that is not their honest and actual motivation, it is mearly a smokescreen. Again, the primary reason is always related to the rage and emotional disturbance of societal leaders and thier citizen-slaves. Society always denies this Truth.

We saw earlier how one tactic used by society to deny this primary motivation of war Truth is to invent "official" reasons for wars. It is noteworthy that the actual reason is the same for all wars, where as the "reasons" offered by societal leaders are variable. Take the american attacks on iraq. America claimed that iraq had "weapons of mass destruction" and that "iraq is a threat to america". This wass not True at all, but accepted as being True by the bulk of Truth-hating citizen-slaves.

However societal leaders realise that even though war is such a sensitive issue, that some citizen-slaves will not want to accept the official line. Therefore american societal leaders have created a climate of social acceptance for a secondary layer of lies, disguised as legitimate "reasons" why iraq was to be attacked. These lies are made to look "secret", "cutting edge" and "rebellious", when in fact they are just a slight-of-hand trick to disguise the real primary reasons why society engages in wars. The secondary "reason" given by society is that the iraqi war was for money or material gain, to steal. It is True that america does renumerate some of it's costs for the war "against" iraq by extorting money from iraq under various false moral guises. It is True that america has some monetary interest iraq.

However, the primary reason why society invokes the war ritual is never money. America would launch it's wars even if it bunkrupted by them. So, even though many citizen-slaves reject the "official reasons" given to them by the government, they do so by embracing another lie. Do they reject the primary societal lie about war in the name of Truth? The answer is no. These same citizen-slaves are simply denying the Truth by using the secondary "reason" of money to deny the primary Truth that wars are launched to satisfy the blood-lust of society. They do not accept the explanation of "money" to seek Truth, because they want to know the Truth. Often leftist types are often drawn to this kind of monetary oppression scenario. Therefore, this "rebellious" views are actually another form of societal conformity and denial of Foribdden Truth.

As I said earlier, monetary gain is never the primary reason for the invokement of the war ritual. There have been wars that have virtually bankrupted countries, and still they want to fight on. Anyone who thinks they are insightful or "at the cutting edge" because they choose to believe in the comfort of the secondary "money" reason are in fact almost as Truth-hating as the citizen-slaves who choose to believe in the "official" reason. In this case both "reasons" are lies, both are denials of the Truth.

Consider that societal leaders of societies start wars. I don't mean by just officially declaring war, but at all levels. Societal leaders are responsible by brainwashing and the instailled rage of citizen-slaves, the demonisation of foreign nations and so on. We must therefore look to the leaders of the countries for answers, and thier personal motivations for starting wars. We must face the Truth that citizen-slaves need wars to emotionally cleanse themselves. We must accept the Truth that nearly all citizen-slaves are secretly happy that thier children are being sent to war to die and commit acts of mass murder on their behalf.

More on the children of war.

Indeed, most soldiers are not old, but young. The armies of all societies are filled with children under the age of 28, not yet fully mature. Society claims that children are mature at 18 or 21, but 99%+ are not mature at this age. Truth-based scientific studies prove that the human brain is not developed and mature at the vulnerable age of 21, yet alone 18. Notice that objective science tests show that a human being is not fully mentally mature and developed until around 26 years of age, and often even more, where as society can give no legitimate and sane rational reason why the adult legal age is set at 18.

All socities use children as their main human fodder in wars. America, australia, england, israel, afghanistan and others all deliberately recruit and brainwash children to murder and die on the behalf of societal leaders and society. Society glorifies war to these impressionable children, even deploys video-games, films and mobile recruitment centres to promote and glorify war to them. Society promotes and markets recruitment products to children under the guise of "toys" such as water pistols, toy soldiers, toy grenades and so on. These kinds of war promotions invariably target young males who are just children. Why is society so keen that younger citizen-slaves risk their lives and die in wars?

1. Society has decreed that children are worthless pieces of property. They are the adult's toy. The younger the citizen-slave the more worthless he or she is decreed to be by society. Therefore when citizen-slaves are to be labelled as "soldiers" by society, society always ensures that the vast majority of them are young children. It is not because children are more effective killers on the battlefield. In fact, maturity, level-headedness and experiance could be very useful on the battlefield. You do not need to be in peak physical condition to fire a rocket, or to throw a grenade.

There is no standard based solely on physical fitness or ability (suitability to the purpose). It is based on age. This is because children are always sacrificed as poison containers by adults. Society wants to keep a consistancy of this theme it has created in it's war ritual. It would be very confusing and unacceptable to brainwashed masses if suddenly the children watched as adults are sent off to die in wars while the children sat comfortably at home. Adults would think "Hey, I thought that children were below me, that's what society always taught me. How can this be right?"

So, too old is not fitting in with the various insane dictates of society. Too young, and the illusion of dencency and the secondary "fitness for pupose" is lost. There needs to be some ability to murder effectively, and young children are not most efficent for this malevolent soceital goal. But more importantly, society is obsessed that societal guilt and Truth must be supressed, minimized and denied at all times. Younger children are kept at home to be used as poison containers. So societal leaders simply maintain children at the top of the human sacrifice poison-container list.

2. Younger less mature humans are easier to convince and deceive on average than adult humans. This is primarily because society has already convinced most citizen-slaves that children are less valuable and must obey their elders. Society uses immaturity and the hot-headedness of children to help trick them on dying on their behalf, and of course commit mass-murder on their behalf.

Always at the heart of the war ritual is the Poison Container concept. You see, all societal leaders are in fact homicidally enraged killers, who suffered traumatic childhoods. In fact, the more a country has social problems and is cathartically enraged, the more wars that country will be involved in, and vice-versa.

The Forbidden Truth here is : modern societies sacrifice their children via the insane war ritual, which constitutes the malevolent mass-murder of human beings to assuage the immense and denied rage, frustrations and anger of the citizen-slaves, while at the same time insanely denying this Truth and making up utterly insane delusions that they are fighting for peace, freedom, and justice.

There is absolutely no reason why any individual child-slave that is being used as a weapon could have any legitimate dispute with the complete strangers in other societies that are falsely declared to be "enemy" societies. The child-soldiers are simply brainwashed and confused weapons, being used by society to perform mass-murder of their behalf, and also to die on their behalf.

This last point is very important to re-cap. The reason why adults send children to die is because they have all been brainwashed that children are the owned property and slaves of adults, and to be used as poison containers. The family unit structure mythology already has this as its basis, and thus societal leaders simply extended this theme to the insane war arena. It is nothing to do with children being able to shoot better than adults, it is nothing to do with ability. Your society would not allow children to send the adults to fight simply because it values adults over children.

The philisophical ramifications of the societal sponsorship of war.

"In your world you can take a pen and write on a piece of paper and destroy 200,000 people and it's okay because you don't have to see it." - Charles Manson.

(Although this statement of Truth by Charles applies to the justice/penal system, it also applies to the war ritual.)

"In other circumstances, I would have gotten a medal for what I did." - Julian Knight.

1. Take society's claims regarding crime and compare them to the act of war. It is amazing how society can murder so many of it's citizen-slaves, and of course other "foreign" citizen-slaves and then claim that society is "good" and that Charlie or Julian is "bad" because he committed a "crime" of murder. Charles was right when he said that society draws a line in the sand and says this is a crime, and this ain't a crime. By sponsoring war, society loses all legitimate claim to render murder illegal. It loses all legitimate claim to punish, morally condemn and even complain about illegal murder acts. Of course, there are many other reasons why this is the case. Reason cannot be selective, because reason is a catagorical system. If society claims murder is wrong based on certain criteria, and then does the exact same actions it creates for itself a contradition and hypocrisy that cannot be resolved.

This proves that society does not, in fact, use reason to make its various decisions and policies at all. What it uses is force and violence, all directed by selfish and warped motivations. When society says "reason", it really means "deranged motivations realized via thuggery and force". Further, society murders thousands, if not millions, of times more than any criminal does. They have real, personal reasons and motivations for killing based on their True Reality as foisted upon them by society. These so-called "criminals" are creations of society - a reflection of society.

Society and the state has so many more resources than the personal "criminal" killer, no personal threats, emotions or motivations to consider, and yet the state claims that its killings are somehow justified and neccesary. At the same time society claims that criminals who do the exact same acts are responsible, guilty, unjustified and their actions unneccesary. They are deemed not to be able to take matters into their own hands, even though the society that taught them does exactly that.

Well, I guess if you are so Truth-hating that you can swallow the war-delusion-pill society gives you then you can delude yourselves into swallowing society's story about "evil" criminal murderer's being "bad" and "responsible" for criminal acts (which are actually the same actions that society does).

2. The next philisophical ramification of the societal sponsorship of war that I am going to write about in this essay is the illegitimacy of human society to exist in the lie-based forms that it does today. Society could exist legitimately as a Truth-based and sane society (based on reason and philosophy of Truth), but no such society currently exists, or has existed ever for at least 5,000 years.

The dangers of human society and it's constant invoking of the insane war ritual are many-fold. Nuclear fall-out, mass murder of all manner of life-forms, and of course the contant threat of total extermination of all life on the planet by human insanity all prove that society cannot justify it's own existance just based on it's endless starting of genocidal wars. The dangers are too great, and the future dangers of such threats as biological and genetic weapons, nano-weapons, and possibly conflict between china and the west all prove to any sane individual that modern lie-based society is a disasterous failure.

3. There is also the consideration of the total lack of mental integrity and morality that society displays by launching endless wars under ridiculous excuses and denials of reality. War is the symptom of lack of mental integrity and sanity, brough about by society via religious indoctrinations, sponsored child trauma and abuse etc etc. How can a society so backwars, immature and immoral (it never learns it lesson) possibly be in a position to dictate what constitutes sanity, integrity and morality to individuals? Society cannot possibly be in a position to do such a thing!

Therefore, one must always reject any claim made by society that it knows what is best, acts in the so-called "interests" of it's created brainwashed citizen-slaves or something is immoral or wrong. Only a rational philisophical anaylsis, mentally independant of society via Mental Freedom, can ne the source of the answers to these questions for any rational and sane thinking individual.

The main portion of this essay is now finisihed. Click here to return.

Propaganda - A Truth-denial tool

What are Uniforms?
Uniforms are a specific clothing that society decrees can only be worn by soldiers on the battlefield. Society facistly decrees to its victim-creations that are allocated as human-weapon-slaves exactly what they must wear, think and do. The primary reason why society uses uniforms is :

A. To remove the personal individuality / identity of the human beings being used as weapon-slaves or "soldiers".
B. To identify who is "the enemy", because otherwise there would be no reason to identify certain people as enemies.

It is common knowledge that soldiers on the battlefield must wear a uniform, so I will not bother presenting any pictures or arguments to that effect.

It is important to realise that only societal leaders have a personal interest in the war. The citizen-slaves who the leader used as weapons have no personal grudge, claim or problem against the "ememy" weapon-slaves they are fighting. They don't even know who any of the other "enemy" weapon-slaves are.

Therefore, the only way for the weapon-slave to know who he is supposed to kill is to be able to identify who the so-called "enemy" is is via an insignia and uniform and instruction.

To the sane and rational thinker, the fact that the enemy needs to be declared and that the two fighting soldiers/teams have never met nor had any issues is proof that the individual has no personal quarrel with the "enemy" weapon-slaves.

The Christmas Truce.

It is a fact, that during "world war 1", that a truce was brokered by two societal leaders (not countries) for a one-day cease-fire on christmas day. Amazingly, you fools actually consider this to be a great humanitarian display of human rights! Amazing!
"Christmas" is a totally illegitimate and non-sensical day that is used to promote lies and myths by society.
Don't you wonder why the truce was called? No, it is not "just because" it is christmas day or the leaders were feeling like helping thier pathetic citizen-slaves.

It was to further mentally re-inforce the brainwashings thier citizen-slaves, that were spending large amounts of time away from the usual toxic environment of thier society. This is not to say that the war environment is not toxic, but being in trenches for long periods of time without as much re-enforcement of societal docorine was not goof for leaders.

Societal leaders realised that thier citizen-slaves could be made to feel like they were fighting for a good reason and cause, that thier "side" was "good" and "right". So they could fight harder and longer, by resting and remotivating them via thier brainwashed human minds!

Why else? Do you really think that the leaders, who already have shown total disregard for the very lives of thier citizen-slaves, would care about the sentimental delusions that they installed into them? Of course they wouldn't!

In Truth, christmas is actaully a major societal brainwashing event designed by societal leaders to enslave and break your minds further.